On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 03:20:46PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 02:28:11PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 04:07:32PM +0530, haris.iqbal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > > From: Md Haris Iqbal <haris.iqbal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > Fixes: 2de6c8de192b ("block/rnbd: server: main functionality")
> > > Reported-by: kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > Signed-off-by: Md Haris Iqbal <haris.iqbal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > The rnbd_server module's communication manager initialization depends on the
> > > registration of the "network namespace subsystem" of the RDMA CM agent module.
> > > As such, when the kernel is configured to load the rnbd_server and the RDMA
> > > cma module during initialization; and if the rnbd_server module is initialized
> > > before RDMA cma module, a null ptr dereference occurs during the RDMA bind
> > > operation.
> > > This patch delays the initialization of the rnbd_server module to the
> > > late_initcall level, since RDMA cma module uses module_init which puts it into
> > > the device_initcall level.
> > > drivers/block/rnbd/rnbd-srv.c | 2 +-
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/block/rnbd/rnbd-srv.c b/drivers/block/rnbd/rnbd-srv.c
> > > index 86e61523907b..213df05e5994 100644
> > > +++ b/drivers/block/rnbd/rnbd-srv.c
> > > @@ -840,5 +840,5 @@ static void __exit rnbd_srv_cleanup_module(void)
> > > rnbd_srv_destroy_sysfs_files();
> > > }
> > >
> > > -module_init(rnbd_srv_init_module);
> > > +late_initcall(rnbd_srv_init_module);
> >
> > I don't think that this is correct change. Somehow nvme-rdma works:
> > module_init(nvme_rdma_init_module);
> > -> nvme_rdma_init_module
> > -> nvmf_register_transport(&nvme_rdma_transport);
> > -> nvme_rdma_create_ctrl
> > -> nvme_rdma_setup_ctrl
> > -> nvme_rdma_configure_admin_queue
> > -> nvme_rdma_alloc_queue
> > -> rdma_create_id
>
> If it does work, it is by luck.
I didn't check every ULP, but it seems that all ULPs use the same
module_init.
>
> Keep in mind all this only matters for kernels without modules.
Can it be related to the fact that other ULPs call to ib_register_client()
before calling to rdma-cm? RNBD does not have such call.
>
> Maybe cma should be upgraded to subsystem_init ? That is a bit tricky
> too as it needs the ib_client stuff working.
It can work, but makes me wonder if it is last change in this area,
every time we touch *_initcall(), we break something else.
I'm not proposing this, but just loudly wondering, do we really need rdma-cm
as a separate module? Can we bring it to be part of ib_core?
Thanks
>
> Jason
