Bart, On 6/5/20 6:43 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote: > We typically do not implement arbitrary limits in the kernel. So I'd > prefer not to introduce any artificial limits. That is what I mentioned in [1] that we can add a check suggested in [1]. That way we will not enforce any limits in the kernel and keep the backward compatibility. Do you see any problem with the approach suggested in [1]. [1] https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-block/msg54754.html
