Re: [PATCH] blk-mq: don't fail driver tag allocation because of inactive hctx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




diff --git a/block/blk-mq-tag.c b/block/blk-mq-tag.c
index 96a39d0724a29..cded7fdcad8ef 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq-tag.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq-tag.c
@@ -191,6 +191,33 @@ unsigned int blk_mq_get_tag(struct blk_mq_alloc_data *data)
       return tag + tag_offset;
   }
   +bool __blk_mq_get_driver_tag(struct request *rq)
+{
+    struct sbitmap_queue *bt = &rq->mq_hctx->tags->bitmap_tags;
+    unsigned int tag_offset = rq->mq_hctx->tags->nr_reserved_tags;
+    bool shared = blk_mq_tag_busy(rq->mq_hctx);

Not necessary to add 'shared' which is just used once.

+    int tag;
+
+    if (blk_mq_tag_is_reserved(rq->mq_hctx->sched_tags, rq->internal_tag)) {
+        bt = &rq->mq_hctx->tags->breserved_tags;

Too many rq->mq_hctx->tags, you can add one local variable to store it.

Otherwise, looks fine:

Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>

Unfortunately this looks to still have problems. So, for a start, this stackframe is pumped out a lot (which I removed, for below):

[  697.464058] Workqueue: kblockd blk_mq_run_work_fn
[  697.468749] Call trace:
[  697.471184]  dump_backtrace+0x0/0x1c0
[  697.474833]  show_stack+0x18/0x28
[  697.478136]  dump_stack+0xc8/0x114
[  697.481524]  __blk_mq_run_hw_queue+0x124/0x130
[  697.485954]  blk_mq_run_work_fn+0x20/0x30
[  697.489951]  process_one_work+0x1e8/0x360
[  697.493947]  worker_thread+0x238/0x478
[  697.497683]  kthread+0x150/0x158
[  697.500898]  ret_from_fork+0x10/0x1c
[  697.504480] run queue from wrong CPU 32, hctx active
[  697.509444] CPU: 32 PID: 1477 Comm: kworker/21:2H Not tainted 5.7.0-

And then other time I get SCSI timeouts:

[95.170616] psci: CPU21 killed (polled 0 ms)
[95.419832] CPU22: shutdown
[95.422630] psci: CPU22 killed (polled 0 ms)
[95.683772] irq_shutdown irq1384MiB/s,w=0KiB/s][r=380k,w=0 IOPS][eta 00m:50s]
[95.687013] CPU23: shutdown
[95.689829] psci: CPU23 killed (polled 0 ms)
[96.379817] CPU24: shutdown
[96.382617] psci: CPU24 killed (polled 0 ms)
[96.703823] CPU25: shutdown=1902MiB/s,w=0KiB/s][r=487k,w=0 IOPS][eta 00m:49s]
[96.706667] psci: CPU25 killed (polled 0 ms)
[97.299845] CPU26: shutdown
[97.302647] psci: CPU26 killed (polled 0 ms)
[97.331737] irq_shutdown irq139
[97.334969] CPU27: shutdown
[97.337774] psci: CPU27 killed (polled 0 ms)
[ 102.308329] CPU28: shutdown=1954MiB/s,w=0KiB/s][r=500k,w=0 IOPS][eta 00m:44s]
[  102.311137] psci: CPU28 killed (polled 0 ms)
[ 102.663877] CPU29: shutdown=1755MiB/s,w=0KiB/s][r=449k,w=0 IOPS][eta 00m:43s]
[  102.666679] psci: CPU29 killed (polled 0 ms)
[ 104.459867] CPU30: shutdown=1552MiB/s,w=0KiB/s][r=397k,w=0 IOPS][eta 00m:42s]
[  104.462668] psci: CPU30 killed (polled 0 ms)
[ 106.259909] IRQ 43: no longer affine to CPU31s][r=414k,w=0 IOPS][eta 00m:40s]
[  106.264273] IRQ 114: no longer affine to CPU31
[  106.268707] IRQ 118: no longer affine to CPU31
[  106.273141] IRQ 123: no longer affine to CPU31
[  106.277579] irq_shutdown irq140
[  106.280757] IRQ 332: no longer affine to CPU31
[  106.285190] IRQ 336: no longer affine to CPU31
[  106.289623] IRQ 338: no longer affine to CPU31
[  106.294056] IRQ 340: no longer affine to CPU31
[  106.298489] IRQ 344: no longer affine to CPU31
[  106.302922] IRQ 348: no longer affine to CPU31
[  106.307450] CPU31: shutdown
[  106.310251] psci: CPU31 killed (polled 0 ms)
[ 108.367884] CPU32: shutdown=1693MiB/s,w=0KiB/s][r=434k,w=0 IOPS][eta 00m:38s]
[  108.370683] psci: CPU32 killed (polled 0 ms)
[ 110.808471] CPU33: shutdown=1747MiB/s,w=0KiB/s][r=447k,w=0 IOPS][eta 00m:35s]
[  110.811269] psci: CPU33 killed (polled 0 ms)
[  110.871804] CPU34: shutdown
[  110.874598] psci: CPU34 killed (polled 0 ms)
[ 111.767879] irq_shutdown irq1412MiB/s,w=0KiB/s][r=418k,w=0 IOPS][eta 00m:34s]
[  111.771171] CPU35: shutdown
[  111.773975] psci: CPU35 killed (polled 0 ms)
[ 113.167866] CPU36: shutdown=1680MiB/s,w=0KiB/s][r=430k,w=0 IOPS][eta 00m:33s]
[  113.170673] psci: CPU36 killed (polled 0 ms)
[ 115.783879] CPU37: shutdown=1839MiB/s,w=0KiB/s][r=471k,w=0 IOPS][eta 00m:30s]
[  115.786675] psci: CPU37 killed (polled 0 ms)
[ 117.111877] CPU38: shutdown=2032MiB/s,w=0KiB/s][r=520k,w=0 IOPS][eta 00m:29s]
[  117.114670] psci: CPU38 killed (polled 0 ms)
[ 121.263701] irq_shutdown irq1423MiB/s,w=0KiB/s][r=428k,w=0 IOPS][eta 00m:25s]
[  121.266996] CPU39: shutdown
[  121.269797] psci: CPU39 killed (polled 0 ms)
[  121.364122] CPU40: shutdown
[  121.366918] psci: CPU40 killed (polled 0 ms)
[  121.448256] CPU41: shutdown
[  121.451058] psci: CPU41 killed (polled 0 ms)
[ 121.515785] CPU42: shutdown=1711MiB/s,w=0KiB/s][r=438k,w=0 IOPS][eta 00m:24s]
[  121.518586] psci: CPU42 killed (polled 0 ms)
[  121.563659] irq_shutdown irq143
[  121.566922] CPU43: shutdown
[  121.569732] psci: CPU43 killed (polled 0 ms)
[ 122.619423] scsi_times_out req=0xffff001faf906900=371k,w=0 IOPS][eta 00m:23s]
[  122.624131] scsi_times_out req=0xffff001faf90ed00
[  122.628842] scsi_times_out req=0xffff001faf90fc00
[  122.633547] scsi_times_out req=0xffff001faf906000
[  122.638259] scsi_times_out req=0xffff001faf906300
[  122.642969] scsi_times_out req=0xffff001faf906600
[  122.647676] scsi_times_out req=0xffff001faf906c00
[  122.652381] scsi_times_out req=0xffff001faf906f00
[  122.657086] scsi_times_out req=0xffff001faf907200
[  122.661791] scsi_times_out req=0xffff001faf907500
[  122.666498] scsi_times_out req=0xffff001faf907800
[  122.671203] scsi_times_out req=0xffff001faf907b00
[  122.675909] scsi_times_out req=0xffff001faf907e00
[  122.680615] scsi_times_out req=0xffff001faf908100
[  122.685319] scsi_times_out req=0xffff001faf908400
[  122.690025] scsi_times_out req=0xffff001faf908700
[  122.694731] scsi_times_out req=0xffff001faf908a00
[  122.699439] scsi_times_out req=0xffff001faf908d00
[  122.704145] scsi_times_out req=0xffff001faf909000
[  122.708849] scsi_times_out req=0xffff001faf909300


And another:

51.336698] CPU53: shutdown
[  251.336737] run queue from wrong CPU 0, hctx active
[  251.339545] run queue from wrong CPU 0, hctx active
[  251.344695] psci: CPU53 killed (polled 0 ms)
[  251.349302] run queue from wrong CPU 0, hctx active
[  251.358447] run queue from wrong CPU 0, hctx active
[  251.363336] run queue from wrong CPU 0, hctx active
[  251.368222] run queue from wrong CPU 0, hctx active
[  251.373108] run queue from wrong CPU 0, hctx active
[ 252.488831] CPU54: shutdown=1094MiB/s,w=0KiB/s][r=280k,w=0 IOPS][eta 00m:04s]
[  252.491629] psci: CPU54 killed (polled 0 ms)
[  252.536533] irq_shutdown irq146
[  252.540007] CPU55: shutdown
[  252.543273] psci: CPU55 killed (polled 0 ms)
[  252.656656] CPU56: shutdown
[  252.659446] psci: CPU56 killed (polled 0 ms)
[ 252.704576] CPU57: shutdown=947MiB/s,w=0KiB/s][r=242k,w=0 IOPS][eta 00m:02s]
[  252.707369] psci: CPU57 killed (polled 0 ms)
[ 254.352646] CPU58: shutdown=677MiB/s,w=0KiB/s][r=173k,w=0 IOPS][eta 00m:02s]
[  254.355442] psci: CPU58 killed (polled 0 ms)
long sleep 1
[ 279.288227] scsi_times_out req=0xffff041fa10b6600[r=0,w=0 IOPS][eta 04m:37s]
[  279.320281] sas: Enter sas_scsi_recover_host busy: 1 failed: 1
[  279.326144] sas: trying to find task 0x00000000e8dca422
[  279.331379] sas: sas_scsi_find_task: aborting task 0x00000000e8dca422

none scheduler seems ok.

So I did see this for mq-deadline scheduler:

] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address
0000000000000040
[  518.688402] Mem abort info:
[  518.691183]ESR = 0x96000004
[  518.694233]EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits
[  518.699568]SET = 0, FnV = 0
[  518.702667] irq_shutdown irq143
[  518.705937] CPU43: shutdown
[  518.706093]EA = 0, S1PTW = 0
[  518.708733] psci: CPU43 killed (polled 0 ms)
[  518.716141] Data abort info:
[  518.719050]ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000004
[  518.722892]CM = 0, WnR = 0
[  518.725867] user pgtable: 4k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp=0000041fa4eae000
[  518.732318] [0000000000000040] pgd=0000000000000000
[  518.737208] Internal error: Oops: 96000004 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
[  518.742768] Modules linked in:
[  518.745812] CPU: 0 PID: 1309 Comm: kworker/43:1H Not tainted
5.7.0-rc2-00125-gf498b5de8a1c #390
[  518.754496] Hardware name: Huawei Taishan 2280 /D05, BIOS Hisilicon D05 IT21
Nemo 2.0 RC0 04/18/2018
[  518.763624] Workqueue: kblockd blk_mq_run_work_fn
[  518.768315] pstate: 80000005 (Nzcv daif -PAN -UAO)
[  518.773094] pc : blk_mq_put_tag+0x2c/0x68
[  518.777091] lr : blk_mq_get_tag+0x2ec/0x338
[  518.781260] sp : ffff800021a53ab0
[  518.784562] x29: ffff800021a53ab0 x28: ffff041f9e81d248
[  518.789861] x27: 00000000000002aa x26: ffff041fa3e49300
[  518.795159] x25: ffff001fb0178fc0 x24: ffff800021a53c68
[  518.800458] x23: 0000000000000000 x22: 0000000000000000
[  518.805756] x21: ffff800011a69000 x20: ffff041fa3e49310
[  518.811055] x19: ffff800021a53b90 x18: 0000000000000004
[  518.816354] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000
[  518.821652] x15: 0000000000000000 x14: 00000000000000ef
[  518.826951] x13: 00000000000000ef x12: 0000000000000001
[  518.832249] x11: 0000000000000000 x10: 00000000000009c0
[  518.837548] x9 : ffff800021a53d50 x8 : ffff041f9e39a620
[  518.842847] x7 : fefefefefefefeff x6 : 0000000000000000
[  518.848146] x5 : 400007ffffffffff x4 : 0000000000001000
[  518.853445] x3 : 00000000000002aa x2 : 0000000000000000
[  518.858743] x1 : 0000000000000000 x0 : ffff041fa3e49300
[  518.864042] Call trace:
[  518.866477]  blk_mq_put_tag+0x2c/0x68
[  518.870126]  blk_mq_get_tag+0x2ec/0x338
[  518.873948]  blk_mq_get_driver_tag+0xf8/0x168
[  518.878292]  blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list+0x118/0x670
[  518.882896]  blk_mq_do_dispatch_sched+0xb0/0x148
[  518.887500]  __blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests+0xec/0x1d8
[  518.892799]  blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests+0x3c/0x78
[  518.897837]  __blk_mq_run_hw_queue+0xb4/0x130
[  518.902181]  blk_mq_run_work_fn+0x20/0x30
[  518.906179]  process_one_work+0x1e8/0x360
[  518.910176]  worker_thread+0x44/0x488
[  518.913825]  kthread+0x150/0x158
[  518.917041]  ret_from_fork+0x10/0x1c
[  518.920606] Code: b9400004 4b020063 6b04007f 540001e2 (b9404022)

With Christoph's patch and "blk-mq: get ctx in order to handle BLK_MQ_S_INACTIVE
in blk_mq_get_tag()" [I didn't test without that patch], no issue detected so far.


I think my patch is no longer required with Christoph's patch.


ah, of course.

Dongli Zhang

Thanks,
John



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux