Re: [PATCH V10 06/11] blk-mq: prepare for draining IO when hctx's all CPUs are offline

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2020-05-04 19:09, Ming Lei wrote:
> @@ -391,6 +393,7 @@ struct blk_mq_ops {
>  enum {
>  	BLK_MQ_F_SHOULD_MERGE	= 1 << 0,
>  	BLK_MQ_F_TAG_SHARED	= 1 << 1,
> +	BLK_MQ_F_NO_MANAGED_IRQ	= 1 << 2,
>  	BLK_MQ_F_BLOCKING	= 1 << 5,
>  	BLK_MQ_F_NO_SCHED	= 1 << 6,
>  	BLK_MQ_F_ALLOC_POLICY_START_BIT = 8,
> diff --git a/include/linux/cpuhotplug.h b/include/linux/cpuhotplug.h
> index 77d70b633531..24b3a77810b6 100644
> --- a/include/linux/cpuhotplug.h
> +++ b/include/linux/cpuhotplug.h
> @@ -152,6 +152,7 @@ enum cpuhp_state {
>  	CPUHP_AP_SMPBOOT_THREADS,
>  	CPUHP_AP_X86_VDSO_VMA_ONLINE,
>  	CPUHP_AP_IRQ_AFFINITY_ONLINE,
> +	CPUHP_AP_BLK_MQ_ONLINE,
>  	CPUHP_AP_ARM_MVEBU_SYNC_CLOCKS,
>  	CPUHP_AP_X86_INTEL_EPB_ONLINE,
>  	CPUHP_AP_PERF_ONLINE,

Wouldn't BLK_MQ_F_NO_IRQ be a better name than BLK_MQ_F_NO_MANAGED_IRQ?

Please add comments that explain what BLK_MQ_F_NO_MANAGED_IRQ and
CPUHP_AP_BLK_MQ_ONLINE mean.

Thanks,

Bart.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux