> On May 8, 2020, at 3:05 PM, Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, May 08, 2020 at 02:46:34PM -0700, Alan Adamson wrote: >> While using the block fake timeout injector to reproduce a nvme error handling hang, a hang was >> observed when the following script was run: >> >> echo 100 > /sys/kernel/debug/fail_io_timeout/probability >> echo 1000 > /sys/kernel/debug/fail_io_timeout/times >> echo 1 > /sys/block/nvme0n1/io-timeout-fail >> dd if=/dev/nvme0n1 of=/dev/null bs=512 count=1 >> >> >> dmesg: >> >> [ 370.018164] INFO: task kworker/u113:9:1191 blocked for more than 122 seconds. >> [ 370.018849] Not tainted 5.7.0-rc4 #1 >> [ 370.019251] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. >> [ 370.019653] kworker/u113:9 D 0 1191 2 0x80004000 >> [ 370.019660] Workqueue: nvme-reset-wq nvme_reset_work [nvme] >> [ 370.019661] Call Trace: >> [ 370.019667] __schedule+0x2dc/0x710 >> [ 370.019668] schedule+0x44/0xb0 >> [ 370.019671] blk_mq_freeze_queue_wait+0x4b/0xb0 >> [ 370.019675] ? finish_wait+0x80/0x80 >> [ 370.019681] nvme_wait_freeze+0x36/0x50 [nvme_core] >> [ 370.019683] nvme_reset_work+0xb65/0xf2b [nvme] >> [ 370.019688] process_one_work+0x1ab/0x380 >> [ 370.019689] worker_thread+0x37/0x3b0 >> [ 370.019691] kthread+0x120/0x140 >> [ 370.019692] ? create_worker+0x1b0/0x1b0 >> [ 370.019693] ? kthread_park+0x90/0x90 >> [ 370.019696] ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40 >> >> This occurs when a fake timeout is scheduled on a request that is in he process >> of being cancelled due to the previous fake timeout. > > Not sure root cause is timeout injection, and in theory request queue shouldn't > have been quiesced before freezing, otherwise it is easy to cause deadlock. It's the handling of the previously injected timeout that causes the queue to the quiesed. When the request is attempted to be canceled (as part of the nvme reset) the request is setup for another timeout and doesn’t get cancelled and the hang then occurs. Alan > > BTW, could you share us how you conclude it is related with queue quiesce? > > Thanks, > Ming >
