Re: [PATCH V8 08/11] block: add blk_end_flush_machinery

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 4/24/20 12:23 PM, Ming Lei wrote:
Flush requests aren't same with normal FS request:

1) one dedicated per-hctx flush rq is pre-allocated for sending flush request

2) flush request si issued to hardware via one machinary so that flush merge
can be applied

We can't simply re-submit flush rqs via blk_steal_bios(), so add
blk_end_flush_machinery to collect flush requests which needs to
be resubmitted:

- if one flush command without DATA is enough, send one flush, complete this
kind of requests

- otherwise, add the request into a list and let caller re-submit it.

Cc: John Garry <john.garry@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  block/blk-flush.c | 123 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
  block/blk.h       |   4 ++
  2 files changed, 120 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-flush.c b/block/blk-flush.c
index 977edf95d711..745d878697ed 100644
--- a/block/blk-flush.c
+++ b/block/blk-flush.c
@@ -170,10 +170,11 @@ static void blk_flush_complete_seq(struct request *rq,
  	unsigned int cmd_flags;
BUG_ON(rq->flush.seq & seq);
-	rq->flush.seq |= seq;
+	if (!error)
+		rq->flush.seq |= seq;
  	cmd_flags = rq->cmd_flags;
- if (likely(!error))
+	if (likely(!error && !fq->flush_queue_terminating))
  		seq = blk_flush_cur_seq(rq);
  	else
  		seq = REQ_FSEQ_DONE;
@@ -200,9 +201,15 @@ static void blk_flush_complete_seq(struct request *rq,
  		 * normal completion and end it.
  		 */
  		BUG_ON(!list_empty(&rq->queuelist));
-		list_del_init(&rq->flush.list);
-		blk_flush_restore_request(rq);
-		blk_mq_end_request(rq, error);
+
+		/* Terminating code will end the request from flush queue */
+		if (likely(!fq->flush_queue_terminating)) {
+			list_del_init(&rq->flush.list);
+			blk_flush_restore_request(rq);
+			blk_mq_end_request(rq, error);
+		} else {
+			list_move_tail(&rq->flush.list, pending);
+		}
  		break;
default:
@@ -279,7 +286,8 @@ static void blk_kick_flush(struct request_queue *q, struct blk_flush_queue *fq,
  	struct request *flush_rq = fq->flush_rq;
/* C1 described at the top of this file */
-	if (fq->flush_pending_idx != fq->flush_running_idx || list_empty(pending))
+	if (fq->flush_pending_idx != fq->flush_running_idx ||
+			list_empty(pending) || fq->flush_queue_terminating)
  		return;
/* C2 and C3
@@ -331,7 +339,7 @@ static void mq_flush_data_end_io(struct request *rq, blk_status_t error)
  	struct blk_flush_queue *fq = blk_get_flush_queue(q, ctx);
if (q->elevator) {
-		WARN_ON(rq->tag < 0);
+		WARN_ON(rq->tag < 0 && !fq->flush_queue_terminating);
  		blk_mq_put_driver_tag(rq);
  	}
@@ -503,3 +511,104 @@ void blk_free_flush_queue(struct blk_flush_queue *fq)
  	kfree(fq->flush_rq);
  	kfree(fq);
  }
+
+static void __blk_end_queued_flush(struct blk_flush_queue *fq,
+		unsigned int queue_idx, struct list_head *resubmit_list,
+		struct list_head *flush_list)
+{
+	struct list_head *queue = &fq->flush_queue[queue_idx];
+	struct request *rq, *nxt;
+
+	list_for_each_entry_safe(rq, nxt, queue, flush.list) {
+		unsigned int seq = blk_flush_cur_seq(rq);
+
+		list_del_init(&rq->flush.list);
+		blk_flush_restore_request(rq);
+		if (!blk_rq_sectors(rq) || seq == REQ_FSEQ_POSTFLUSH )
+			list_add_tail(&rq->queuelist, flush_list);
+		else
+			list_add_tail(&rq->queuelist, resubmit_list);
+	}
+}
+
+static void blk_end_queued_flush(struct blk_flush_queue *fq,
+		struct list_head *resubmit_list, struct list_head *flush_list)
+{
+	unsigned long flags;
+
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&fq->mq_flush_lock, flags);
+	__blk_end_queued_flush(fq, 0, resubmit_list, flush_list);
+	__blk_end_queued_flush(fq, 1, resubmit_list, flush_list);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fq->mq_flush_lock, flags);
+}
+
+/* complete requests which just requires one flush command */
+static void blk_complete_flush_requests(struct blk_flush_queue *fq,
+		struct list_head *flush_list)
+{
+	struct block_device *bdev;
+	struct request *rq;
+	int error = -ENXIO;
+
+	if (list_empty(flush_list))
+		return;
+
+	rq = list_first_entry(flush_list, struct request, queuelist);
+
+	/* Send flush via one active hctx so we can move on */
+	bdev = bdget_disk(rq->rq_disk, 0);
+	if (bdev) {
+		error = blkdev_issue_flush(bdev, GFP_KERNEL, NULL);
+		bdput(bdev);
+	}
+
+	while (!list_empty(flush_list)) {
+		rq = list_first_entry(flush_list, struct request, queuelist);
+		list_del_init(&rq->queuelist);
+		blk_mq_end_request(rq, error);
+	}
+}
+
I must admit I'm getting nervous if one mixes direct request manipulations with high-level 'blkdev_XXX' calls. Can't we just requeue everything including the flush itself, and letting the requeue algorithm pick a new hctx?

Cheers,

Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke            Teamlead Storage & Networking
hare@xxxxxxx                               +49 911 74053 688
SUSE Software Solutions GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg), Geschäftsführer: Felix Imendörffer



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux