On Fri 24-04-20 08:52:53, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 01:03:47PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote: > > There's no error handling in the caller and this function actually returns > > unsigned int... So I believe you need to return 0 here to maintain previous > > behavior (however suspicious it may be)? > > Indeed, and I don't think it is suspicious at all - if we have no CDROM > info we should assume session 0, which is the same as for non-CDROM > devices. Fixed for the next version. Right, I've realized that once I've checked UDF version and thought about it for a while... Honza -- Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx> SUSE Labs, CR
