Re: [PATCH] nbd: Fix memory leak from krealloc() if another allocation fails

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi

[This is an automated email]

This commit has been processed because it contains a -stable tag.
The stable tag indicates that it's relevant for the following trees: .+

The bot has tested the following trees: v5.6.5, v5.5.18, v5.4.33, v4.19.116, v4.14.176, v4.9.219, v4.4.219.

v5.6.5: Build OK!
v5.5.18: Build OK!
v5.4.33: Build OK!
v4.19.116: Build OK!
v4.14.176: Build OK!
v4.9.219: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
    20032ec38d16 ("nbd: reset the setup task for NBD_CLEAR_SOCK")
    5ea8d10802ec ("nbd: separate out the config information")
    9442b739207a ("nbd: cleanup ioctl handling")
    9561a7ade0c2 ("nbd: add multi-connection support")
    feffa5cc7b47 ("nbd: fix setting of 'error' in NBD_DO_IT ioctl")

v4.4.219: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
    0e4f0f6f63d3 ("nbd: Cleanup reset of nbd and bdev after a disconnect")
    1f7b5cf1be43 ("nbd: Timeouts are not user requested disconnects")
    23272a6754b8 ("nbd: Remove signal usage")
    37091fdd831f ("nbd: Create size change events for userspace")
    5ea8d10802ec ("nbd: separate out the config information")
    9561a7ade0c2 ("nbd: add multi-connection support")
    97240963eb30 ("nbd: fix race in ioctl")
    9b4a6ba9185a ("nbd: use flags instead of bool")
    fd8383fd88a2 ("nbd: convert to blkmq")


NOTE: The patch will not be queued to stable trees until it is upstream.

How should we proceed with this patch?

-- 
Thanks
Sasha



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux