On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 3:49 PM Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > An additional question: since this function sets the status of 'lo' > based on the information in 'info', would "loop_set_status" or > "loop_set_status_from_info" be a better name for this function? Yeah, I like the latter. I will rename, and add a comment that explains the purpose more clearly. Thanks, Martijn > > Thanks, > > Bart.
