On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 12:38:26PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> On 4/13/20 11:18 PM, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> > On commit 6ac93117ab00 ("blktrace: use existing disk debugfs directory")
> > merged on v4.12 Omar fixed the original blktrace code for request-based
> > drivers (multiqueue). This however left in place a possible crash, if you
> > happen to abuse blktrace in a way it was not intended.
> >
> > Namely, if you loop adding a device, setup the blktrace with BLKTRACESETUP,
> > forget to BLKTRACETEARDOWN, and then just remove the device you end up
> > with a panic:
>
> I think this patch makes this all cleaner anyway, but - without the apparent
> loop bug mentioned by Bart which allows removal of the loop device while blktrace
> is active (if I read that right), can this still happen?
I have not tested that, but some modifications of the break-blktrace
program could enable us to test that, however I don't think the race
would be possible after patch 3/5 "blktrace: refcount the request_queue
during ioctl" is merged, as removal then a pending blktrace would
refcount the request_queue and the removal would have to wait until
the refcount is decremeneted, until after the blktrace ioctl.
Luis
