Re: [PATCH v8 2/2] loop: Better discard support for block devices

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 12:27:26PM +0200, Andrzej Pietrasiewicz wrote:
> > The backingq could move into this local scope.
> > 
> > > +	} else if ((!file->f_op->fallocate) || lo->lo_encrypt_key_size) {
> > 
> > No need for the inner braces.
> > 
> > But the actual functionality looks good to me.
> > 
> 
> Would you A-b or R-b if I corrected the two small issues which you found?

Sure:

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux