Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] block/diskstats: more accurate io_ticks and optimization

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 3/24/20 12:39 AM, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
> Simplified estimation for io_ticks introduced in patch
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/20181206164122.2166-5-snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx/
> could be very inaccurate for request longer than jiffy (i.e. any HDD)
> 
> There is at least one another report about this:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/20200324031942.GA3060@ming.t460p/
> See detail in comment for first patch.
> 
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/155413438394.3201.15211440151043943989.stgit@buzz/
> v2: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/158314549775.1788.6529015932237292177.stgit@buzz/
> v3:
>  * update documentation
>  * rebase to current linux-next
>  * fix compilation for CONFIG_SMP=n

Can you respin this against my for-5.7/block branch?

-- 
Jens Axboe




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux