Re: disk revalidation updates and OOM

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 3/16/20 7:37 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 07:01:09PM +0800, He Zhe wrote:
>>> Do 142fe8f and 979c690d work with the build fix applied? (f0b870d
>>> shouldn't be interesting for this case).
>> Sorry for slow reply.
>>
>> With my build fix applied, the issue is triggered since 142fe8f.
>> And I can see the endless loop of invalidate and revalidate...
> Thanks.  Can you test the patch below that restores the previous
> rather odd behavior of not clearing the capacity to 0 if partition
> scanning is not enabled?

This fixes the issue. I also validated it on v5.6-rc6.

Thank you very much.

Zhe

>
>
> diff --git a/fs/block_dev.c b/fs/block_dev.c
> index 69bf2fb6f7cd..daac27f4b821 100644
> --- a/fs/block_dev.c
> +++ b/fs/block_dev.c
> @@ -1520,10 +1520,13 @@ int bdev_disk_changed(struct block_device *bdev, bool invalidate)
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;
>  
> -	if (invalidate)
> -		set_capacity(disk, 0);
> -	else if (disk->fops->revalidate_disk)
> -		disk->fops->revalidate_disk(disk);
> +	if (invalidate) {
> +		if (disk_part_scan_enabled(disk))
> +			set_capacity(disk, 0);
> +	} else {
> +		if (disk->fops->revalidate_disk)
> +			disk->fops->revalidate_disk(disk);
> +	}
>  
>  	check_disk_size_change(disk, bdev, !invalidate);
>  




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux