Re: [PATCH] blktrace: Protect q->blk_trace with RCU

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Mar 03, 2020 at 02:07:32PM +0300, Cengiz Can wrote:
> Added a reassignment into the NULL check block to fix the issue.
> 
> Fixes: c780e86dd48 ("blktrace: Protect q->blk_trace with RCU")
> 
> Signed-off-by: Cengiz Can <cengiz@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  kernel/trace/blktrace.c | 4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/blktrace.c b/kernel/trace/blktrace.c
> index 4560878f0bac..29ea88f10b87 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/blktrace.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/blktrace.c
> @@ -1896,8 +1896,10 @@ static ssize_t sysfs_blk_trace_attr_store(struct device *dev,
>  	}
> 
>  	ret = 0;
> -	if (bt == NULL)
> +	if (bt == NULL) {
>  		ret = blk_trace_setup_queue(q, bdev);
> +		bt = q->blk_trace;
> +	}
> 
>  	if (ret == 0) {
>  		if (attr == &dev_attr_act_mask)
> --
> 2.25.1
>

<formletter>

This is not the correct way to submit patches for inclusion in the
stable kernel tree.  Please read:
    https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html
for how to do this properly.

</formletter>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux