On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 08:33:52PM +0300, Kirill Tkhai wrote: > Hi, Darrick, > > On 12.02.2020 19:58, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 12:33:53PM +0300, Kirill Tkhai wrote: > >> This adds support for REQ_ALLOCATE extension of REQ_OP_WRITE_ZEROES > >> operation, which encourages a block device driver to just allocate > >> blocks (or mark them allocated) instead of actual blocks zeroing. > >> REQ_ALLOCATE is aimed to be used for network filesystems providing > >> a block device interface. Also, block devices, which map a file > >> on other filesystem (like loop), may use this for less fragmentation > >> and batching fallocate() requests. Hypervisors like QEMU may > >> introduce optimizations of clusters allocations based on this. > >> > >> BLKDEV_ZERO_ALLOCATE is a new corresponding flag for > >> blkdev_issue_zeroout(). > >> > >> Stacking devices start from zero max_allocate_sectors limit for now, > >> and the support is going to be implemented separate for each device > >> in the future. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> Reviewed-by: Bob Liu <bob.liu@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> --- > >> block/blk-lib.c | 17 ++++++++++------- > >> block/blk-settings.c | 4 ++++ > >> fs/block_dev.c | 4 ++++ > >> include/linux/blk_types.h | 5 ++++- > >> include/linux/blkdev.h | 13 ++++++++++--- > >> 5 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/block/blk-lib.c b/block/blk-lib.c > >> index 3e38c93cfc53..9cd6f86523ba 100644 > >> --- a/block/blk-lib.c > >> +++ b/block/blk-lib.c > >> @@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ static int __blkdev_issue_write_zeroes(struct block_device *bdev, > >> struct bio **biop, unsigned flags) > >> { > >> struct bio *bio = *biop; > >> - unsigned int max_write_zeroes_sectors; > >> + unsigned int max_write_zeroes_sectors, req_flags = 0; > >> struct request_queue *q = bdev_get_queue(bdev); > >> > >> if (!q) > >> @@ -224,18 +224,21 @@ static int __blkdev_issue_write_zeroes(struct block_device *bdev, > >> return -EPERM; > >> > >> /* Ensure that max_write_zeroes_sectors doesn't overflow bi_size */ > >> - max_write_zeroes_sectors = bdev_write_zeroes_sectors(bdev, 0); > >> + max_write_zeroes_sectors = bdev_write_zeroes_sectors(bdev, flags); > >> > >> if (max_write_zeroes_sectors == 0) > >> return -EOPNOTSUPP; > >> > >> + if (flags & BLKDEV_ZERO_NOUNMAP) > >> + req_flags |= REQ_NOUNMAP; > >> + if (flags & BLKDEV_ZERO_ALLOCATE) > >> + req_flags |= REQ_ALLOCATE|REQ_NOUNMAP; > >> + > >> while (nr_sects) { > >> bio = blk_next_bio(bio, 0, gfp_mask); > >> bio->bi_iter.bi_sector = sector; > >> bio_set_dev(bio, bdev); > >> - bio->bi_opf = REQ_OP_WRITE_ZEROES; > >> - if (flags & BLKDEV_ZERO_NOUNMAP) > >> - bio->bi_opf |= REQ_NOUNMAP; > >> + bio->bi_opf = REQ_OP_WRITE_ZEROES | req_flags; > >> > >> if (nr_sects > max_write_zeroes_sectors) { > >> bio->bi_iter.bi_size = max_write_zeroes_sectors << 9; > >> @@ -362,7 +365,7 @@ int blkdev_issue_zeroout(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t sector, > >> sector_t bs_mask; > >> struct bio *bio; > >> struct blk_plug plug; > >> - bool try_write_zeroes = !!bdev_write_zeroes_sectors(bdev, 0); > >> + bool try_write_zeroes = !!bdev_write_zeroes_sectors(bdev, flags); > >> > >> bs_mask = (bdev_logical_block_size(bdev) >> 9) - 1; > >> if ((sector | nr_sects) & bs_mask) > >> @@ -391,7 +394,7 @@ int blkdev_issue_zeroout(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t sector, > >> try_write_zeroes = false; > >> goto retry; > >> } > >> - if (!bdev_write_zeroes_sectors(bdev, 0)) { > >> + if (!bdev_write_zeroes_sectors(bdev, flags)) { > >> /* > >> * Zeroing offload support was indicated, but the > >> * device reported ILLEGAL REQUEST (for some devices > >> diff --git a/block/blk-settings.c b/block/blk-settings.c > >> index c8eda2e7b91e..8d5df9d37239 100644 > >> --- a/block/blk-settings.c > >> +++ b/block/blk-settings.c > >> @@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ void blk_set_default_limits(struct queue_limits *lim) > >> lim->chunk_sectors = 0; > >> lim->max_write_same_sectors = 0; > >> lim->max_write_zeroes_sectors = 0; > >> + lim->max_allocate_sectors = 0; > >> lim->max_discard_sectors = 0; > >> lim->max_hw_discard_sectors = 0; > >> lim->discard_granularity = 0; > >> @@ -83,6 +84,7 @@ void blk_set_stacking_limits(struct queue_limits *lim) > >> lim->max_dev_sectors = UINT_MAX; > >> lim->max_write_same_sectors = UINT_MAX; > >> lim->max_write_zeroes_sectors = UINT_MAX; > >> + lim->max_allocate_sectors = 0; > >> } > >> EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_set_stacking_limits); > >> > >> @@ -506,6 +508,8 @@ int blk_stack_limits(struct queue_limits *t, struct queue_limits *b, > >> b->max_write_same_sectors); > >> t->max_write_zeroes_sectors = min(t->max_write_zeroes_sectors, > >> b->max_write_zeroes_sectors); > >> + t->max_allocate_sectors = min(t->max_allocate_sectors, > >> + b->max_allocate_sectors); > >> t->bounce_pfn = min_not_zero(t->bounce_pfn, b->bounce_pfn); > >> > >> t->seg_boundary_mask = min_not_zero(t->seg_boundary_mask, > >> diff --git a/fs/block_dev.c b/fs/block_dev.c > >> index 69bf2fb6f7cd..1ffef894b3bd 100644 > >> --- a/fs/block_dev.c > >> +++ b/fs/block_dev.c > >> @@ -2122,6 +2122,10 @@ static long blkdev_fallocate(struct file *file, int mode, loff_t start, > >> error = blkdev_issue_zeroout(bdev, start >> 9, len >> 9, > >> GFP_KERNEL, BLKDEV_ZERO_NOFALLBACK); > >> break; > >> + case FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE: > >> + error = blkdev_issue_zeroout(bdev, start >> 9, len >> 9, > >> + GFP_KERNEL, BLKDEV_ZERO_ALLOCATE | BLKDEV_ZERO_NOFALLBACK); > > > > I think this should be ^^^ indented to match the other calls. > > The only idea I have about this is something like the below. But the below is over 90 char... > > error = blkdev_issue_zeroout(bdev, start >> 9, len >> 9, > GFP_KERNEL, > BLKDEV_ZERO_ALLOCATE | BLKDEV_ZERO_NOFALLBACK); > > Could you please clarify what you mean? I mostly meant that the indent for the nth lines ought to be more than a single indent to make it easier to scan through the code, but you're right, the kernel indentation style is uglier. I could suggest something like this, which actually does fit: case FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE: error = blkdev_issue_zeroout(bdev, start >> 9, len >> 9, GFP_KERNEL, BLKDEV_ZERO_ALLOCATE | BLKDEV_ZERO_NOFALLBACK); break; But that's apparently apocryphal. :/ --D > >> case FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE | FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE | FALLOC_FL_NO_HIDE_STALE: > >> error = blkdev_issue_discard(bdev, start >> 9, len >> 9, > >> GFP_KERNEL, 0); > >> diff --git a/include/linux/blk_types.h b/include/linux/blk_types.h > >> index 70254ae11769..86accd2caa4e 100644 > >> --- a/include/linux/blk_types.h > >> +++ b/include/linux/blk_types.h > >> @@ -335,7 +335,9 @@ enum req_flag_bits { > >> > >> /* command specific flags for REQ_OP_WRITE_ZEROES: */ > >> __REQ_NOUNMAP, /* do not free blocks when zeroing */ > >> - > >> + __REQ_ALLOCATE, /* only notify about allocated blocks, > >> + * and do not actually zero them > > > > "only notify"? Is someone getting a notification? Or are we simply > > "notifying" the device that it must ensure allocated blocks? > > > > If it's that last one, then perhaps this should be reworded: > > > > /* > > * Ensure the LBA range is backed by physical storage > > * without writing zeroes to the blocks. > > */ > > Sounds good. > > >> + */ > >> __REQ_HIPRI, > >> > >> /* for driver use */ > >> @@ -362,6 +364,7 @@ enum req_flag_bits { > >> #define REQ_CGROUP_PUNT (1ULL << __REQ_CGROUP_PUNT) > >> > >> #define REQ_NOUNMAP (1ULL << __REQ_NOUNMAP) > >> +#define REQ_ALLOCATE (1ULL << __REQ_ALLOCATE) > >> #define REQ_HIPRI (1ULL << __REQ_HIPRI) > >> > >> #define REQ_DRV (1ULL << __REQ_DRV) > >> diff --git a/include/linux/blkdev.h b/include/linux/blkdev.h > >> index 55a714161684..40707f980a2e 100644 > >> --- a/include/linux/blkdev.h > >> +++ b/include/linux/blkdev.h > >> @@ -336,6 +336,7 @@ struct queue_limits { > >> unsigned int max_hw_discard_sectors; > >> unsigned int max_write_same_sectors; > >> unsigned int max_write_zeroes_sectors; > >> + unsigned int max_allocate_sectors; > >> unsigned int discard_granularity; > >> unsigned int discard_alignment; > >> > >> @@ -990,6 +991,8 @@ static inline struct bio_vec req_bvec(struct request *rq) > >> static inline unsigned int blk_queue_get_max_write_zeroes_sectors( > >> struct request_queue *q, unsigned int op_flags) > >> { > >> + if (op_flags & REQ_ALLOCATE) > >> + return q->limits.max_allocate_sectors; > >> return q->limits.max_write_zeroes_sectors; > >> } > >> > >> @@ -1226,6 +1229,7 @@ extern int __blkdev_issue_discard(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t sector, > >> > >> #define BLKDEV_ZERO_NOUNMAP (1 << 0) /* do not free blocks */ > >> #define BLKDEV_ZERO_NOFALLBACK (1 << 1) /* don't write explicit zeroes */ > >> +#define BLKDEV_ZERO_ALLOCATE (1 << 2) /* allocate range of blocks */ > >> > >> extern int __blkdev_issue_zeroout(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t sector, > >> sector_t nr_sects, gfp_t gfp_mask, struct bio **biop, > >> @@ -1430,10 +1434,13 @@ static inline unsigned int bdev_write_zeroes_sectors(struct block_device *bdev, > >> { > >> struct request_queue *q = bdev_get_queue(bdev); > >> > >> - if (q) > >> - return q->limits.max_write_zeroes_sectors; > >> + if (!q) > >> + return 0; > >> > >> - return 0; > >> + if (flags & BLKDEV_ZERO_ALLOCATE) > >> + return q->limits.max_allocate_sectors; > >> + else > >> + return q->limits.max_write_zeroes_sectors; > >> } > >> > >> static inline enum blk_zoned_model bdev_zoned_model(struct block_device *bdev) > >> > >> > > Thanks, > Kirill