在 2020/2/12 6:23, Omar Sandoval 写道:
On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 11:15:35AM +0800, sunke (E) wrote:
Hi Omar,
The nbd/003 you simplified does the same I want to do and I made some small
changes. I ran the simplified nbd/003 with linux kernel at the commit
7e0165b2f1a, it could pass.Then, I rollbacked the linux kernel to commit
090bb803708, it indeed triggered the BUGON.
However, there is one difference. NBD has ioctl and netlink interfaces. I
use the netlink interface and the simplified nbd/003 use the ioctl
interface. The nbd/003 with the netlink interface indeed seem to trigger
some other issue. So, can it be nbd/004?
Sure, how about we add a flag to mount_clear_sock that specifies to use
the netlink interface instead of the ioctl interface, and make nbd/004
which is the same as nbd/003 expect it runs it with the netlink flag?
Hi Omar
I can not understand adding a flag to mount_clear_sock. How about add
_start_nbd_server_netlink and _stop_nbd_server_netlink in tests/nbd/rc,
others can also reuse the code?
Thanks
Sun Ke
