Re: [PATCH 14/17] bcache: back to cache all readahead I/Os

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2020/1/24 2:31 上午, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 1/23/20 10:27 AM, Coly Li wrote:
>> On 2020/1/24 1:19 上午, Michael Lyle wrote:
>>> Hi Coly and Jens--
>>>
>>> One concern I have with this is that it's going to wear out
>>> limited-lifetime SSDs a -lot- faster.  Was any thought given to making
>>> this a tunable instead of just changing the behavior?  Even if we have
>>> an anecdote or two that it seems to have increased performance for
>>> some workloads, I don't expect it will have increased performance in
>>> general and it may even be costly for some workloads (it all comes
>>> down to what is more useful in the cache-- somewhat-recently readahead
>>> data, or the data that it is displacing).
>>
>> Hi Mike,
>>
>> Copied. This is good suggestion, I will do it after I back from Lunar
>> New Year vacation, and submit it with other tested patches in following
>> v5.6-rc versions.
> 
> Do you want me to just drop this patch for now from the series?
> 
Hi Jens,

OK, please drop this patch from this series. I will re-submit the patch
with sysfs interface later with other patches.

Thanks.

-- 

Coly Li



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux