Re: Re [PATCH] Adding multiple workers to the loop device.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2020-01-21 12:10, muraliraja.muniraju wrote:
> +	for (i = 0; i < lo->num_loop_workers; i++) {
> +		kthread_init_worker(&(lo->workers[i]));
> +		lo->worker_tasks[i] = kthread_run(
> +				loop_kthread_worker_fn, &(lo->workers[i]),
> +				"loop%d(%d)", lo->lo_number, i);
> +		if (IS_ERR((lo->worker_tasks[i])))
> +			goto err;
> +		set_user_nice(lo->worker_tasks[i], MIN_NICE);
> +	}

Unless if there is a really good reason, the workqueue mechanism should
be used instead of creating kthreads. And again unless if there is a
really good reason, one of the system workqueues (e.g. system_wq) should
be used instead of creating dedicated workqueues.

Bart.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux