On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 2:48 PM Leon Romanovsky <leon@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 01:59:07PM +0100, Jack Wang wrote:
> > From: Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > This is main functionality of rnbd-client module, which provides
> > interface to map remote device as local block device /dev/rnbd<N>
> > and feeds RTRS with IO requests.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Danil Kipnis <danil.kipnis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/block/rnbd/rnbd-clt.c | 1730 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 1730 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 drivers/block/rnbd/rnbd-clt.c
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/block/rnbd/rnbd-clt.c b/drivers/block/rnbd/rnbd-clt.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..7d8cb38d3969
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/block/rnbd/rnbd-clt.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,1730 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
> > +/*
> > + * RDMA Network Block Driver
> > + *
> > + * Copyright (c) 2014 - 2018 ProfitBricks GmbH. All rights reserved.
> > + *
> > + * Copyright (c) 2018 - 2019 1&1 IONOS Cloud GmbH. All rights reserved.
> > + *
> > + * Copyright (c) 2019 - 2020 1&1 IONOS SE. All rights reserved.
> > + */
> > +
> > +#undef pr_fmt
> > +#define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME " L" __stringify(__LINE__) ": " fmt
> > +
> > +#include <linux/module.h>
> > +#include <linux/blkdev.h>
> > +#include <linux/hdreg.h>
> > +#include <linux/scatterlist.h>
> > +#include <linux/idr.h>
> > +
> > +#include "rnbd-clt.h"
> > +
> > +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("RDMA Network Block Device Client");
> > +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> > +
> > +static int rnbd_client_major;
> > +static DEFINE_IDA(index_ida);
> > +static DEFINE_MUTEX(ida_lock);
> > +static DEFINE_MUTEX(sess_lock);
> > +static LIST_HEAD(sess_list);
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Maximum number of partitions an instance can have.
> > + * 6 bits = 64 minors = 63 partitions (one minor is used for the device itself)
> > + */
> > +#define RNBD_PART_BITS 6
> > +
> > +static inline bool rnbd_clt_get_sess(struct rnbd_clt_session *sess)
> > +{
> > + return refcount_inc_not_zero(&sess->refcount);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void free_sess(struct rnbd_clt_session *sess);
> > +
> > +static void rnbd_clt_put_sess(struct rnbd_clt_session *sess)
> > +{
> > + might_sleep();
> > +
> > + if (refcount_dec_and_test(&sess->refcount))
> > + free_sess(sess);
> > +}
>
> I see that this code is for drivers/block and maybe it is a way to do it
> there, but in RDMA, we don't like abstraction of general and well-known
> kernel APIs. It looks like kref to me.
I can try to convert to kref interface if other guys also think it's necessary.
>
> > +
> > +static inline bool rnbd_clt_dev_is_mapped(struct rnbd_clt_dev *dev)
> > +{
> > + return dev->dev_state == DEV_STATE_MAPPED;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void rnbd_clt_put_dev(struct rnbd_clt_dev *dev)
> > +{
> > + might_sleep();
> > +
> > + if (refcount_dec_and_test(&dev->refcount)) {
> > + mutex_lock(&ida_lock);
> > + ida_simple_remove(&index_ida, dev->clt_device_id);
> > + mutex_unlock(&ida_lock);
> > + kfree(dev->hw_queues);
> > + rnbd_clt_put_sess(dev->sess);
> > + kfree(dev);
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline bool rnbd_clt_get_dev(struct rnbd_clt_dev *dev)
> > +{
> > + return refcount_inc_not_zero(&dev->refcount);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int rnbd_clt_set_dev_attr(struct rnbd_clt_dev *dev,
> > + const struct rnbd_msg_open_rsp *rsp)
> > +{
> > + struct rnbd_clt_session *sess = dev->sess;
> > +
> > + if (unlikely(!rsp->logical_block_size))
> > + return -EINVAL;
>
> unlikely() again.
will remove.
snip
> > +static void rnbd_put_iu(struct rnbd_clt_session *sess, struct rnbd_iu *iu)
> > +{
> > + if (atomic_dec_and_test(&iu->refcount))
> > + rnbd_put_permit(sess, iu->permit);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void rnbd_softirq_done_fn(struct request *rq)
> > +{
> > + struct rnbd_clt_dev *dev = rq->rq_disk->private_data;
> > + struct rnbd_clt_session *sess = dev->sess;a
>
> Please no vertical alignment in new code, it adds a lot of churn if such
> line is changed later and creates difficulties for the backports.
It does look nicer when it can be aligned. I don't get why backport is
an argument here.
Thanks
