Re: [PATCH] block: fix splitting segments

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 02:37:44PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 09:10:24PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On 1/9/20 7:00 PM, Ming Lei wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 10:58:01AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 08:18:04AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > > > On 1/9/20 12:16 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > > > > On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 10:03:41AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > > > > > > It has been addressed in:
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/axboe/linux-block.git/commit/?h=block-5.5&id=ecd255974caa45901d0b8fab03626e0a18fbc81a
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > That is probably correct, but still highly suboptimal for most 32-bit
> > > > > > architectures where physical addresses are 32 bits wide.  To fix that
> > > > > > the proper phys_addr_t type should be used.
> > > > > 
> > > > > I'll swap it for phys_addr_t - we used to use dma_address_t or something
> > > > > like that, but I missed this type.
> > > > 
> > > > Guenter mentioned that 'page_to_phys(start_page) as well as offset are
> > > > sometimes 0'[1].
> > > > 
> > > > If that(zero page physical address) can happen when phys_addr_t is 32bit,
> > > > I guess phys_addr_t may not work too.
> > > > 
> > > > Guener, could you test the patch in link[2] again?
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/20200108023822.GB28075@ming.t460p/T/#m5862216b960454fc41a85204defbb887983bfd75
> > > > [2] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/axboe/linux-block.git/commit/?h=block-5.5&id=b6a89c4a9590663f80486662fe9a9c1f4cee31f4
> > > 
> > > Loop Guener in.
> > > 
> > 
> > The patch at [2] doesn't work.
> > 
> > My understanding is that the page in question is not mapped when
> > get_max_segment_size() is called (after all, the operation is the
> > result of a page fault). This is why page_to_phys() returns 0.
> 
> page_to_phys() supposes to return page's physical address, which
> should just depend on this machine's physical address space,
> not related with page mapping.
> 
> I understand physical address 0 might be valid, such as the 1st
> page frame of ram.
> 
> > 
> > You'll either need a local u64 variable, or use some other means
> > to handle that situation. Something like
> > 
> >     phys_addr_t paddr = page_to_phys(start_page);
> > 
> >     if (paddr == 0)
> > 	return queue_max_segment_size(q);
> > 
> > at the beginning of the function might do, though there might
> > still be a problem when the page is later assigned and crosses
> > a segment boundary (if that is possible).
> 
> IMO, zero physical address case is the only corner case not
> covered by using 'phys_addr_t'. If phys_addr_t is 32bit, sum of
> page_to_phys(start_page) and offset shouldn't be >= 4G.

Or could you test the following patch?

diff --git a/block/blk-merge.c b/block/blk-merge.c
index 347782a24a35..d1bed8c382bf 100644
--- a/block/blk-merge.c
+++ b/block/blk-merge.c
@@ -164,8 +164,13 @@ static inline unsigned get_max_segment_size(const struct request_queue *q,
 	unsigned long mask = queue_segment_boundary(q);
 
 	offset = mask & (page_to_phys(start_page) + offset);
-	return min_t(unsigned long, mask - offset + 1,
-		     queue_max_segment_size(q));
+
+	/*
+	 * overflow may be triggered in case of zero page physical address
+	 * on 32bit arch, use queue's max segment size when that happens
+	 */
+	return min_not_zero(mask - offset + 1,
+			(unsigned long)queue_max_segment_size(q));
 }
 
 /**


Thanks,
Ming




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux