On Fri, Jan 3, 2020 at 12:55 AM Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 12/30/19 2:29 AM, Jack Wang wrote:
> > +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("InfiniBand Network Block Device Client");
>
> InfiniBand or RDMA?
will fix.
>
> > +static int rnbd_clt_set_dev_attr(struct rnbd_clt_dev *dev,
> > + const struct rnbd_msg_open_rsp *rsp)
> > +{
> > + struct rnbd_clt_session *sess = dev->sess;
> > +
> > + if (unlikely(!rsp->logical_block_size))
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + dev->device_id = le32_to_cpu(rsp->device_id);
> > + dev->nsectors = le64_to_cpu(rsp->nsectors);
> > + dev->logical_block_size = le16_to_cpu(rsp->logical_block_size);
> > + dev->physical_block_size = le16_to_cpu(rsp->physical_block_size);
> > + dev->max_write_same_sectors = le32_to_cpu(rsp->max_write_same_sectors);
> > + dev->max_discard_sectors = le32_to_cpu(rsp->max_discard_sectors);
> > + dev->discard_granularity = le32_to_cpu(rsp->discard_granularity);
> > + dev->discard_alignment = le32_to_cpu(rsp->discard_alignment);
> > + dev->secure_discard = le16_to_cpu(rsp->secure_discard);
> > + dev->rotational = rsp->rotational;
> > +
> > + dev->max_hw_sectors = sess->max_io_size / dev->logical_block_size;
>
> The above statement looks suspicious to me. The unit of the second
> argument of blk_queue_max_hw_sectors() is 512 bytes. Since
> dev->max_hw_sectors is passed as the second argument to
> blk_queue_max_hw_sectors() I think it should also have 512 bytes as unit
> instead of the logical block size.
You're right, will fix.
>
> > +static int rnbd_clt_change_capacity(struct rnbd_clt_dev *dev,
> > + size_t new_nsectors)
> > +{
> > + int err = 0;
> > +
> > + rnbd_clt_info(dev, "Device size changed from %zu to %zu sectors\n",
> > + dev->nsectors, new_nsectors);
> > + dev->nsectors = new_nsectors;
> > + set_capacity(dev->gd,
> > + dev->nsectors * (dev->logical_block_size /
> > + SECTOR_SIZE));
> > + err = revalidate_disk(dev->gd);
> > + if (err)
> > + rnbd_clt_err(dev,
> > + "Failed to change device size from %zu to %zu, err: %d\n",
> > + dev->nsectors, new_nsectors, err);
> > + return err;
> > +}
>
> Please document the unit of nsectors in struct rnbd_clt_dev. Please also
> document the unit of the 'new_nsectors' argument.
will do. The unit of nsectors is 512b.
>
> > +static void msg_io_conf(void *priv, int errno)
> > +{
> > + struct rnbd_iu *iu = priv;
> > + struct rnbd_clt_dev *dev = iu->dev;
> > + struct request *rq = iu->rq;
> > +
> > + iu->status = errno ? BLK_STS_IOERR : BLK_STS_OK;
> > +
> > + blk_mq_complete_request(rq);
> > +
> > + if (errno)
> > + rnbd_clt_info_rl(dev, "%s I/O failed with err: %d\n",
> > + rq_data_dir(rq) == READ ? "read" : "write",
> > + errno);
> > +}
>
> Accessing 'rq' after having called blk_mq_complete_request() may trigger
> a use-after-free. Please don't do that.
You are right, will fix.
>
> > +static void wait_for_rtrs_disconnection(struct rnbd_clt_session *sess)
> > +__releases(&sess_lock)
> > +__acquires(&sess_lock)
>
> Please indent __releases() and __acquires() annotations.
ok.
>
> > +static int setup_mq_tags(struct rnbd_clt_session *sess)
> > +{
> > + struct blk_mq_tag_set *tags = &sess->tag_set;
> > +
> > + memset(tags, 0, sizeof(*tags));
> > + tags->ops = &rnbd_mq_ops;
> > + tags->queue_depth = sess->queue_depth;
> > + tags->numa_node = NUMA_NO_NODE;
> > + tags->flags = BLK_MQ_F_SHOULD_MERGE |
> > + BLK_MQ_F_TAG_SHARED;
> > + tags->cmd_size = sizeof(struct rnbd_iu);
> > + tags->nr_hw_queues = num_online_cpus();
> > +
> > + return blk_mq_alloc_tag_set(tags);
> > +}
>
> Please change the name of the "tags" pointer into "tag_set".
ok.
>
> > +static int index_to_minor(int index)
> > +{
> > + return index << RNBD_PART_BITS;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int minor_to_index(int minor)
> > +{
> > + return minor >> RNBD_PART_BITS;
> > +}
>
> Is it useful to introduce functions that encapsulate a single shift
> operation?
can be dropped, althrough it's common to do it this way, plenty of
examples in kernel tree.
>
> > + blk_queue_virt_boundary(dev->queue, 4095);
>
> The virt_boundary parameter must match the RDMA memory registration page
> size. Please introduce a symbolic constant for the RDMA memory
> registration page size such that these two parameters stay in sync in
> case anyone would want to change the memory registration page size.
>
> > +static void rnbd_clt_setup_gen_disk(struct rnbd_clt_dev *dev, int idx)
> > +{
> > + dev->gd->major = rnbd_client_major;
> > + dev->gd->first_minor = index_to_minor(idx);
> > + dev->gd->fops = &rnbd_client_ops;
> > + dev->gd->queue = dev->queue;
> > + dev->gd->private_data = dev;
> > + snprintf(dev->gd->disk_name, sizeof(dev->gd->disk_name), "rnbd%d",
> > + idx);
> > + pr_debug("disk_name=%s, capacity=%zu\n",
> > + dev->gd->disk_name,
> > + dev->nsectors * (dev->logical_block_size / SECTOR_SIZE)
> > + );
> > +
> > + set_capacity(dev->gd, dev->nsectors * (dev->logical_block_size /
> > + SECTOR_SIZE));
>
> Again, what is the unit of dev->nsectors?
The unit is 512b, I will remove the multipler, in most of the case
logical_block_size is SECTOR_SIZE.
>
> > +static void rnbd_clt_add_gen_disk(struct rnbd_clt_dev *dev)
> > +{
> > + add_disk(dev->gd);
> > +}
>
> Is it useful to introduce this wrapper around add_disk()?
will remove the wrapper.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bart.
Thanks Bart.
