Re: [PATCH] block: make the io_ticks counter more accurate

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 2019/12/18 9:28 上午, Jens Axboe wrote:
On 12/17/19 7:28 AM, Wen Yang wrote:
Instead of the jiffies, we should update the io_ticks counter
with the passed in parameter 'now'.

But they are not the same clock source...


Hi Jens,
Thanks for your comments.
We plan to change it to the following version,
please kindly help with some suggestions.
Thank you.


diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
index 379f6f5..da7de9f 100644
--- a/block/blk-core.c
+++ b/block/blk-core.c
@@ -1365,7 +1365,7 @@ void blk_account_io_done(struct request *req, u64 now)
 		part_stat_lock();
 		part = req->part;

-		update_io_ticks(part, jiffies);
+		update_io_ticks(part, nsecs_to_jiffies(now));
 		part_stat_inc(part, ios[sgrp]);
 		part_stat_add(part, nsecs[sgrp], now - req->start_time_ns);
part_stat_add(part, time_in_queue, nsecs_to_jiffies64(now - req->start_time_ns)); @@ -1407,7 +1407,7 @@ void blk_account_io_start(struct request *rq, bool new_io)
 		rq->part = part;
 	}

-	update_io_ticks(part, jiffies);
+	update_io_ticks(part, nsecs_to_jiffies(ktime_get_ns()));

 	part_stat_unlock();
 }
--
1.8.3.1


--
Best Regards,
Wen




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux