Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] xen/interface: re-define FRONT/BACK_RING_ATTACH()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12.12.19 07:04, Jürgen Groß wrote:
On 11.12.19 16:29, Paul Durrant wrote:
Currently these macros are defined to re-initialize a front/back ring
(respectively) to values read from the shared ring in such a way that any
requests/responses that are added to the shared ring whilst the front/back
is detached will be skipped over. This, in general, is not a desirable
semantic since most frontend implementations will eventually block waiting
for a response which would either never appear or never be processed.

Since the macros are currently unused, take this opportunity to re-define
them to re-initialize a front/back ring using specified values. This also
allows FRONT/BACK_RING_INIT() to be re-defined in terms of
FRONT/BACK_RING_ATTACH() using a specified value of 0.

NOTE: BACK_RING_ATTACH() will be used directly in a subsequent patch.

Signed-off-by: Paul Durrant <pdurrant@xxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>

Paul, I think you should send a patch changing ring.h in the Xen tree.

As soon as it has been accepted I'll take your series for the kernel.


Juergen



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux