On 28.11.19 г. 23:11 ч., Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> Check "!=" in multi-layer comparisons. The same memory usage, fewer
> instructions, and 2 from 4 jumps are replaced with SETcc.
>
> Note, that list_sort() doesn't differ 0 and <0.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@xxxxxxxxx>
My first reaction was this is wrong since you no longer return negative
values. But then I looked into list_sort/merge and this branch
'if (cmp(priv, a, b) <= 0) {' clearly shows this is correct.
So :
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
> block/blk-mq.c | 12 ++++--------
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
> index 323c9cb28066..f32a3cfdd34e 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq.c
> @@ -1668,14 +1668,10 @@ static int plug_rq_cmp(void *priv, struct list_head *a, struct list_head *b)
> struct request *rqa = container_of(a, struct request, queuelist);
> struct request *rqb = container_of(b, struct request, queuelist);
>
> - if (rqa->mq_ctx < rqb->mq_ctx)
> - return -1;
> - else if (rqa->mq_ctx > rqb->mq_ctx)
> - return 1;
> - else if (rqa->mq_hctx < rqb->mq_hctx)
> - return -1;
> - else if (rqa->mq_hctx > rqb->mq_hctx)
> - return 1;
> + if (rqa->mq_ctx != rqb->mq_ctx)
> + return rqa->mq_ctx > rqb->mq_ctx;
> + if (rqa->mq_hctx != rqb->mq_hctx)
> + return rqa->mq_hctx > rqb->mq_hctx;
>
> return blk_rq_pos(rqa) > blk_rq_pos(rqb);
> }
>
