Re: [PATCH] iocost: don't nest spin_lock_irq in ioc_weight_write()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 01:53:41PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> This code causes a static analysis warning:
> 
>     block/blk-iocost.c:2113 ioc_weight_write() error: double lock 'irq'
> 
> We disable IRQs in blkg_conf_prep() and re-enable them in
> blkg_conf_finish().  IRQ disable/enable should not be nested because
> that means the IRQs will be enabled at the first unlock instead of the
> second one.
> 
> Fixes: 7caa47151ab2 ("blkcg: implement blk-iocost")
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks.

-- 
tejun



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux