On 10/23/19 1:10 AM, zhangyi (F) wrote: > The sequence number of reqs on the timeout_list before the timeout req > should be adjusted in io_timeout_fn(), because the current timeout req > will consumes a slot in the cq_ring and cq_tail pointer will be > increased, otherwise other timeout reqs may return in advance without > waiting for enough wait_nr. Thanks, applied both patches. Will run them through some extra testing tomorrow, but looks good so far. -- Jens Axboe
