Re: [RFC PATCH 02/21] Add a prelocked wake-up

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 2:48 PM David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Add a wakeup call for a case whereby the caller already has the waitqueue
> spinlock held.

That naming is crazy.

We already have helper functions like this, and they are just called
"wake_up_locked()".

So the "prelocked" naming is just odd. Make it be
wake_up_interruptible_sync_poll_locked().

The helper function should likely be

  void __wake_up_locked_sync_key(struct wait_queue_head *wq_head,
unsigned int mode, void *key)
  {
        __wake_up_common(wq_head, mode, 1, WF_SYNC, key, NULL);
  }
  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__wake_up_locked_sync_key);

to match the other naming patterns there.

[ Unrelated ]

Looking at that mess of functions, I also wonder if we should try to
just remove the bookmark code again. It was cute, and it was useful,
but I think the problem with the page lock list may have been fixed by
commit 9a1ea439b16b ("mm: put_and_wait_on_page_locked() while page is
migrated") which avoids the retry condition with
migrate_page_move_mapping().

Tim/Kan? Do you have the problematic load still?

              Linus



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux