Re: [PATCH 1/2] io_uring: make the logic clearer for io_sequence_defer

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




> 2019年10月11日 11:42,Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> 写道:
> 
> On 10/10/19 9:41 PM, Jackie Liu wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>> 2019年10月11日 11:34,Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> 写道:
>>> 
>>> On 10/10/19 9:27 PM, Jackie Liu wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> 2019年10月11日 11:17,Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> 写道:
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 10/10/19 9:06 PM, Jackie Liu wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 2019年10月11日 10:35,Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> 写道:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On 10/10/19 8:24 PM, yangerkun wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On 2019/10/9 9:19, Jackie Liu wrote:
>>>>>>>>> __io_get_deferred_req is used to get all defer lists, including defer_list
>>>>>>>>> and timeout_list, but io_sequence_defer should be only cares about the sequence.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Jackie Liu <liuyun01@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>>   fs/io_uring.c | 13 +++++--------
>>>>>>>>>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
>>>>>>>>> index 8a0381f1a43b..8ec2443eb019 100644
>>>>>>>>> --- a/fs/io_uring.c
>>>>>>>>> +++ b/fs/io_uring.c
>>>>>>>>> @@ -418,9 +418,7 @@ static struct io_ring_ctx *io_ring_ctx_alloc(struct io_uring_params *p)
>>>>>>>>>   static inline bool io_sequence_defer(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
>>>>>>>>>   				     struct io_kiocb *req)
>>>>>>>>>   {
>>>>>>>>> -	/* timeout requests always honor sequence */
>>>>>>>>> -	if (!(req->flags & REQ_F_TIMEOUT) &&
>>>>>>>>> -	    (req->flags & (REQ_F_IO_DRAIN|REQ_F_IO_DRAINED)) != REQ_F_IO_DRAIN)
>>>>>>>>> +	if ((req->flags & (REQ_F_IO_DRAIN|REQ_F_IO_DRAINED)) != REQ_F_IO_DRAIN)
>>>>>>>>>   		return false;
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>   	return req->sequence != ctx->cached_cq_tail + ctx->rings->sq_dropped;
>>>>>>>>> @@ -435,12 +433,11 @@ static struct io_kiocb *__io_get_deferred_req(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
>>>>>>>>>   		return NULL;
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>   	req = list_first_entry(list, struct io_kiocb, list);
>>>>>>>>> -	if (!io_sequence_defer(ctx, req)) {
>>>>>>>>> -		list_del_init(&req->list);
>>>>>>>>> -		return req;
>>>>>>>>> -	}
>>>>>>>>> +	if (!(req->flags & REQ_F_TIMEOUT) && io_sequence_defer(ctx, req))
>>>>>>>>> +		return NULL;
>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> For timeout req, we should also compare the sequence to determine to
>>>>>>>> return NULL or the req. But now we will return req directly. Actually,
>>>>>>>> no need to compare req->flags with REQ_F_TIMEOUT.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Yes, not sure how I missed this, the patch is broken as-is. I will kill
>>>>>>> it, cleanup can be done differently.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Sorry for miss it, I don't wanna change the logic, it's not my
>>>>>> original meaning.
>>>>> 
>>>>> No worries, mistakes happen.
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Personal opinion, timeout list should not be mixed with defer_list,
>>>>>> which makes the code more complicated and difficult to understand.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Not sure why you feel they are mixed? They are in separate lists, but
>>>>> they share using the sequence logic. In that respet they are really not
>>>>> that different, the sequence will trigger either one of them. Either as
>>>>> a timeout, or as a "can now be issued". Hence the code handling them is
>>>>> both shared and identical.
>>>> 
>>>> I not sure, I think I need reread the code of timeout command.
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> I do agree that the check could be cleaner, which is probably how the
>>>>> mistake in this patch happened in the first place.
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Yes, I agree with you. io_sequence_defer should be only cares about
>>>> the sequence.  Thanks for point out this mistake.
>>> 
>>> How about something like this? More cleanly separates them to avoid
>>> mixing flags. The regular defer code will honor the flags, the timeout
>>> code will just bypass those.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
>>> index c92cb09cc262..4a2bb81cb1f1 100644
>>> --- a/fs/io_uring.c
>>> +++ b/fs/io_uring.c
>>> @@ -416,26 +416,29 @@ static struct io_ring_ctx *io_ring_ctx_alloc(struct io_uring_params *p)
>>> 	return ctx;
>>> }
>>> 
>>> +static inline bool __io_sequence_defer(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
>>> +				       struct io_kiocb *req)
>>> +{
>>> +	return req->sequence != ctx->cached_cq_tail + ctx->rings->sq_dropped;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> static inline bool io_sequence_defer(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
>>> 				     struct io_kiocb *req)
>>> {
>>> -	/* timeout requests always honor sequence */
>>> -	if (!(req->flags & REQ_F_TIMEOUT) &&
>>> -	    (req->flags & (REQ_F_IO_DRAIN|REQ_F_IO_DRAINED)) != REQ_F_IO_DRAIN)
>>> +	if ((req->flags & (REQ_F_IO_DRAIN|REQ_F_IO_DRAINED)) != REQ_F_IO_DRAIN)
>>> 		return false;
>>> 
>>> -	return req->sequence != ctx->cached_cq_tail + ctx->rings->sq_dropped;
>>> +	return __io_sequence_defer(ctx, req);
>>> }
>>> 
>>> -static struct io_kiocb *__io_get_deferred_req(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
>>> -					      struct list_head *list)
>>> +static struct io_kiocb *io_get_deferred_req(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
>>> {
>>> 	struct io_kiocb *req;
>>> 
>>> -	if (list_empty(list))
>>> +	if (list_empty(&ctx->defer_list))
>>> 		return NULL;
>>> 
>>> -	req = list_first_entry(list, struct io_kiocb, list);
>>> +	req = list_first_entry(&ctx->defer_list, struct io_kiocb, list);
>>> 	if (!io_sequence_defer(ctx, req)) {
>>> 		list_del_init(&req->list);
>>> 		return req;
>>> @@ -444,14 +447,20 @@ static struct io_kiocb *__io_get_deferred_req(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
>>> 	return NULL;
>>> }
>>> 
>>> -static struct io_kiocb *io_get_deferred_req(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
>>> -{
>>> -	return __io_get_deferred_req(ctx, &ctx->defer_list);
>>> -}
>>> -
>>> static struct io_kiocb *io_get_timeout_req(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
>>> {
>>> -	return __io_get_deferred_req(ctx, &ctx->timeout_list);
>>> +	struct io_kiocb *req;
>>> +
>>> +	if (list_empty(&ctx->timeout_list))
>>> +		return NULL;
>>> +
>>> +	req = list_first_entry(&ctx->timeout_list, struct io_kiocb, list);
>>> +	if (!__io_sequence_defer(ctx, req)) {
>>> +		list_del_init(&req->list);
>>> +		return req;
>>> +	}
>>> +
>>> +	return NULL;
>>> }
>>> 
>>> static void __io_commit_cqring(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
>>> 
>> 
>> Much better, clearly and easy understand.
> 
> Agree, this is easier to read as well, and harder to inadvertently
> break. Can I add your reviewed-by to this one?
> 
> 

Yes, please, Reviewed-by: Jackie Liu <liuyun01@xxxxxxxxxx>


--
BR, Jackie Liu






[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux