Re: packet writing support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 2019-10-05 at 09:50 -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:

> It's not really a case of quid pro quo, if someone gets removed,
> something else can stay. I'd argue that the floppy driver is probably
> used by orders of magnitude more people than the packet writing code,
> and as such that makes it much more important to maintain.

I'm not into time-reversal, if that is what you mean?! I love unilinear time and causal computers!

Regards,
Mischa.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux