Re: [PATCH] io_uring: Fix reversed nonblock flag

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I haven't followed the code path properly, but it looks strange to me.
Jens, could you take a look?


On 04/10/2019 11:25, Pavel Begunkov (Silence) wrote:
> From: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> io_queue_link_head() accepts @force_nonblock flag, but io_ring_submit()
> passes something opposite.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  fs/io_uring.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
> index c934f91c51e9..ffe66512ca07 100644
> --- a/fs/io_uring.c
> +++ b/fs/io_uring.c
> @@ -2761,7 +2761,7 @@ static int io_ring_submit(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, unsigned int to_submit,
>  
>  	if (link)
>  		io_queue_link_head(ctx, link, &link->submit, shadow_req,
> -					block_for_last);
> +					force_nonblock);
>  	if (statep)
>  		io_submit_state_end(statep);
>  
> 

-- 
Yours sincerely,
Pavel Begunkov

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux