On 9/23/19 8:12 AM, Ming Lei wrote:
@@ -523,11 +521,9 @@ void elv_unregister_queue(struct request_queue *q)
kobject_uevent(&e->kobj, KOBJ_REMOVE);
kobject_del(&e->kobj);
- mutex_lock(&q->sysfs_lock);
e->registered = 0;
/* Re-enable throttling in case elevator disabled it */
wbt_enable_default(q);
- mutex_unlock(&q->sysfs_lock);
}
}
Does this patch cause sysfs_lock to be held around
kobject_del(&e->kobj)? Since sysfs_lock is locked from inside
elv_attr_show() and elv_attr_store(), does this mean that this patch
reintroduces the lock inversion problem that was fixed recently?
Thanks,
Bart.