Re: [PATCH 1/2] blk-mq: fixup request re-insert in blk_mq_try_issue_list_directly()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 9/19/19 4:19 PM, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 11:45:46AM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>> From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxxx>
>>
>> When blk_mq_request_issue_directly() returns BLK_STS_RESOURCE we
>> need to requeue the I/O, but adding it to the global request list
>> will mess up with the passed-in request list. So re-add the request
> 
> We always add request to hctx->dispatch_list after .queue_rq() returns
> BLK_STS_RESOURCE or BLK_STS_DEV_RESOURCE, so what is the messing up?
> 
>> to the original list and leave it to the caller to handle situations
>> where the list wasn't completely emptied.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  block/blk-mq.c | 3 +--
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
>> index b038ec680e84..44ff3c1442a4 100644
>> --- a/block/blk-mq.c
>> +++ b/block/blk-mq.c
>> @@ -1899,8 +1899,7 @@ void blk_mq_try_issue_list_directly(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
>>  		if (ret != BLK_STS_OK) {
>>  			if (ret == BLK_STS_RESOURCE ||
>>  					ret == BLK_STS_DEV_RESOURCE) {
>> -				blk_mq_request_bypass_insert(rq,
>> -							list_empty(list));
>> +				list_add(list, &rq->queuelist);
> 
> This way may let this request(DONTPREP set) to be merged with other rq
> or bio, and potential data corruption may be caused, please see commit:
> 
> 	c616cbee97ae blk-mq: punt failed direct issue to dispatch list
> 
Ok.
What triggered this patch is this code:

insert:
	if (bypass_insert)
		return BLK_STS_RESOURCE;

	blk_mq_request_bypass_insert(rq, run_queue);
	return BLK_STS_OK;
}

static void blk_mq_try_issue_directly(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
		struct request *rq, blk_qc_t *cookie)
{
	blk_status_t ret;
	int srcu_idx;

	might_sleep_if(hctx->flags & BLK_MQ_F_BLOCKING);

	hctx_lock(hctx, &srcu_idx);

	ret = __blk_mq_try_issue_directly(hctx, rq, cookie, false, true);
	if (ret == BLK_STS_RESOURCE || ret == BLK_STS_DEV_RESOURCE)
		blk_mq_request_bypass_insert(rq, true);
	
IE blk_mq_request_bypass_insert() will be called always once we hit the
'insert' label, the only difference being the second parameter of that
function.
I'd rather have the sequence consolidated, preferably by calling
blk_mq_request_bypass_insert() in one place only, and not scatter the
calls all over the code.

Cheers,

Hannes
-- 
Dr. Hannes Reinecke		      Teamlead Storage & Networking
hare@xxxxxxx			                  +49 911 74053 688
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
HRB 247165 (AG München), GF: Felix Imendörffer



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux