News of this change? Can we have it (or the solution with the symlinks if you prefer it) for 5.4? Thanks, Paolo > Il giorno 9 set 2019, alle ore 09:31, Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@xxxxxxxxxx> ha scritto: > > Hi Jens, > now that BFQ's weight interface has been fixed [1], can we proceed > with this change? > > In addition to acking this solution, in [2] Tejun already suggested a > reduced version of the present patch. In Tejun's version, only > bfq.weight is changed. But I guess that legacy code may use also some > of the other bfq parameters in cgroups, without the bfq prefix. Apart > from that, any version is ok for me, provided that it solves the > current confusing situation for userspace [3]. > > Thanks, > Paolo > > [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/8/27/1716 > [2] https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg35823.html > [3] https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/7057 > > Angelo Ruocco (1): > block, bfq: delete "bfq" prefix from cgroup filenames > > block/bfq-cgroup.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------- > 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) > > -- > 2.20.1
