> Il giorno 11 set 2019, alle ore 16:16, Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> ha scritto: > > Hello, > > On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 10:18:53AM +0200, Paolo Valente wrote: >>> The two being enabled at the same time doesn't make sense, so we can >>> just switch over to bfq when bfq is selected as the iosched. I asked >>> what Paolo wanted to do in terms of interface a couple times now but >>> didn't get an answer and he posted a patch which makes the two >>> controllers conflict, so.... Paolo, so it looks like you want to >>> rename all bfq files to drop the bfq prefix, right? >> >> Yep, mainly because ... this is the solution you voted and you >> yourself proposed [1] :) >> >> [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10988261/ > > So, that was then. Since then the interface change has been published > and userspace, at least some of them, already had to adjust. Now, I > don't have any opinion on the matter and flipping again will cause > inconveniences to some subset of users. It's your call. > Ok, then let's go for removing bfq prefix, as expected, e.g., by systemd community [1]. A few days ago I reposted a patch removing the prefix from all involved parameters [2], it should make all legacy software work again. [1] https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/7057 [2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/9/9/47 >>> I can implement >>> the switching if so. >> >> That would be perfect. > > Whichever way it gets decided, this is easy enough. I'll prep a > patch. > Thank you for that too, Paolo > Thanks. > > -- > tejun
