On 09/10/2019 05:00 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 09, 2019 at 11:28:04AM -0500, Mike Christie wrote:
>> There are several storage drivers like dm-multipath, iscsi, and nbd that
>> have userspace components that can run in the IO path. For example,
>> iscsi and nbd's userspace deamons may need to recreate a socket and/or
>> send IO on it, and dm-multipath's daemon multipathd may need to send IO
>> to figure out the state of paths and re-set them up.
>>
>> In the kernel these drivers have access to GFP_NOIO/GFP_NOFS and the
>> memalloc_*_save/restore functions to control the allocation behavior,
>> but for userspace we would end up hitting a allocation that ended up
>> writing data back to the same device we are trying to allocate for.
>>
>> This patch allows the userspace deamon to set the PF_MEMALLOC* flags
>> through procfs. It currently only supports PF_MEMALLOC_NOIO, but
>> depending on what other drivers and userspace file systems need, for
>> the final version I can add the other flags for that file or do a file
>> per flag or just do a memalloc_noio file.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mike Christie <mchristi@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt | 6 ++++
>> fs/proc/base.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 59 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt b/Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt
>> index 99ca040e3f90..b5456a61a013 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt
>> @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ Table of Contents
>> 3.10 /proc/<pid>/timerslack_ns - Task timerslack value
>> 3.11 /proc/<pid>/patch_state - Livepatch patch operation state
>> 3.12 /proc/<pid>/arch_status - Task architecture specific information
>> + 3.13 /proc/<pid>/memalloc - Control task's memory reclaim behavior
>>
>> 4 Configuring procfs
>> 4.1 Mount options
>> @@ -1980,6 +1981,11 @@ Example
>> $ cat /proc/6753/arch_status
>> AVX512_elapsed_ms: 8
>>
>> +3.13 /proc/<pid>/memalloc - Control task's memory reclaim behavior
>> +-----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> +A value of "noio" indicates that when a task allocates memory it will not
>> +reclaim memory that requires starting phisical IO.
>> +
>> Description
>> -----------
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/proc/base.c b/fs/proc/base.c
>> index ebea9501afb8..c4faa3464602 100644
>> --- a/fs/proc/base.c
>> +++ b/fs/proc/base.c
>> @@ -1223,6 +1223,57 @@ static const struct file_operations proc_oom_score_adj_operations = {
>> .llseek = default_llseek,
>> };
>>
>> +static ssize_t memalloc_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf, size_t count,
>> + loff_t *ppos)
>> +{
>> + struct task_struct *task;
>> + ssize_t rc = 0;
>> +
>> + task = get_proc_task(file_inode(file));
>> + if (!task)
>> + return -ESRCH;
>> +
>> + if (task->flags & PF_MEMALLOC_NOIO)
>> + rc = simple_read_from_buffer(buf, count, ppos, "noio", 4);
>> + put_task_struct(task);
>> + return rc;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static ssize_t memalloc_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
>> + size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
>> +{
>> + struct task_struct *task;
>> + char buffer[5];
>> + int rc = count;
>> +
>> + memset(buffer, 0, sizeof(buffer));
>> + if (count != sizeof(buffer) - 1)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + if (copy_from_user(buffer, buf, count))
>> + return -EFAULT;
>> + buffer[count] = '\0';
>> +
>> + task = get_proc_task(file_inode(file));
>> + if (!task)
>> + return -ESRCH;
>> +
>> + if (!strcmp(buffer, "noio")) {
>> + task->flags |= PF_MEMALLOC_NOIO;
>> + } else {
>> + rc = -EINVAL;
>> + }
>
> Really? Without any privilege check? So any random user can tap into
> __GFP_NOIO allocations?
That was a mistake on my part. I will add it in.
