Jan Stancek <jstancek@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> Using the device while mounting same device doesn't work reliably like
>> this race. (getblk() is intentionally used to get the buffer to write
>> new data.)
>
> Are you saying this is expected even if 'usage' is just read?
Yes, assuming exclusive access.
>> mount(2) internally opens the device by EXCL mode, so I guess udev opens
>> without EXCL (I dont know if it is intent or not).
>
> I gave this a try and added O_EXCL to udev-builtin-blkid.c. My system had trouble
> booting, it was getting stuck on mounting LVM volumes.
>
> So, I'm not sure how to move forward here.
OK. I'm still think the userspace should avoid to use blockdev while
mounting though, this patch will workaround this race with small race.
Can you test this?
Thanks.
--
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH] fat: Workaround the race with userspace's read via blockdev while mounting
If userspace reads the buffer via blockdev while mounting,
sb_getblk()+modify can race with buffer read via blockdev.
For example,
FS userspace
bh = sb_getblk()
modify bh->b_data
read
ll_rw_block(bh)
fill bh->b_data by on-disk data
/* lost modified data by FS */
set_buffer_uptodate(bh)
set_buffer_uptodate(bh)
The userspace should not use the blockdev while mounting though, the
udev seems to be already doing this. Although I think the udev should
try to avoid this, workaround the race by small overhead.
Signed-off-by: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/fat/dir.c | 13 +++++++++++--
fs/fat/fatent.c | 3 +++
2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff -puN fs/fat/dir.c~fat-workaround-getblk fs/fat/dir.c
--- linux/fs/fat/dir.c~fat-workaround-getblk 2019-09-10 09:29:51.137292020 +0900
+++ linux-hirofumi/fs/fat/dir.c 2019-09-10 09:39:15.366295152 +0900
@@ -1100,8 +1100,11 @@ static int fat_zeroed_cluster(struct ino
err = -ENOMEM;
goto error;
}
+ /* Avoid race with userspace read via bdev */
+ lock_buffer(bhs[n]);
memset(bhs[n]->b_data, 0, sb->s_blocksize);
set_buffer_uptodate(bhs[n]);
+ unlock_buffer(bhs[n]);
mark_buffer_dirty_inode(bhs[n], dir);
n++;
@@ -1158,6 +1161,8 @@ int fat_alloc_new_dir(struct inode *dir,
fat_time_unix2fat(sbi, ts, &time, &date, &time_cs);
de = (struct msdos_dir_entry *)bhs[0]->b_data;
+ /* Avoid race with userspace read via bdev */
+ lock_buffer(bhs[0]);
/* filling the new directory slots ("." and ".." entries) */
memcpy(de[0].name, MSDOS_DOT, MSDOS_NAME);
memcpy(de[1].name, MSDOS_DOTDOT, MSDOS_NAME);
@@ -1180,6 +1185,7 @@ int fat_alloc_new_dir(struct inode *dir,
de[0].size = de[1].size = 0;
memset(de + 2, 0, sb->s_blocksize - 2 * sizeof(*de));
set_buffer_uptodate(bhs[0]);
+ unlock_buffer(bhs[0]);
mark_buffer_dirty_inode(bhs[0], dir);
err = fat_zeroed_cluster(dir, blknr, 1, bhs, MAX_BUF_PER_PAGE);
@@ -1237,11 +1243,14 @@ static int fat_add_new_entries(struct in
/* fill the directory entry */
copy = min(size, sb->s_blocksize);
+ /* Avoid race with userspace read via bdev */
+ lock_buffer(bhs[n]);
memcpy(bhs[n]->b_data, slots, copy);
- slots += copy;
- size -= copy;
set_buffer_uptodate(bhs[n]);
+ unlock_buffer(bhs[n]);
mark_buffer_dirty_inode(bhs[n], dir);
+ slots += copy;
+ size -= copy;
if (!size)
break;
n++;
diff -puN fs/fat/fatent.c~fat-workaround-getblk fs/fat/fatent.c
--- linux/fs/fat/fatent.c~fat-workaround-getblk 2019-09-10 09:36:20.247225406 +0900
+++ linux-hirofumi/fs/fat/fatent.c 2019-09-10 09:36:43.847100048 +0900
@@ -388,8 +388,11 @@ static int fat_mirror_bhs(struct super_b
err = -ENOMEM;
goto error;
}
+ /* Avoid race with userspace read via bdev */
+ lock_buffer(c_bh);
memcpy(c_bh->b_data, bhs[n]->b_data, sb->s_blocksize);
set_buffer_uptodate(c_bh);
+ unlock_buffer(c_bh);
mark_buffer_dirty_inode(c_bh, sbi->fat_inode);
if (sb->s_flags & SB_SYNCHRONOUS)
err = sync_dirty_buffer(c_bh);
_
