On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 09:09:36PM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
> Some SD/MMC host controllers can support packed command or packed request,
> that means we can package several requests to host controller at one time
> to improve performence. And this patch set will introduce MMC packed function
> to support this feature by following patches.
>
> To support MMC packed function, the MMC layer need to know if there are
> requests are pending now in hardware queue to help to combine requests
> as much as possible. If we know there are requests pending in hardware
> queue, then we should not package requests to host controller immediately,
> instead we should collect more requests into MMC packed queue to be packed
> to host controller with packed condition.
>
> Thus export this function for MMC packed function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> block/blk-mq.c | 3 ++-
> include/linux/blk-mq.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
> index b038ec6..5bd4ef9 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq.c
> @@ -63,12 +63,13 @@ static int blk_mq_poll_stats_bkt(const struct request *rq)
> * Check if any of the ctx, dispatch list or elevator
> * have pending work in this hardware queue.
> */
> -static bool blk_mq_hctx_has_pending(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
> +bool blk_mq_hctx_has_pending(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
> {
> return !list_empty_careful(&hctx->dispatch) ||
> sbitmap_any_bit_set(&hctx->ctx_map) ||
> blk_mq_sched_has_work(hctx);
> }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blk_mq_hctx_has_pending);
Just wondering why you don't use the 'last' field of 'struct blk_mq_queue_data',
which is passed to .queue_rq(), and supposed for implementing batch submission.
Thanks,
Ming
