Re: [PATCH 0/2] Fix misuse of blk_rq_stats in blk-iolatency

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ping?

On 20/06/2019 10:18, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Josef, thanks for taking a look.
> 
> 
> Although, there is nothing critical yet -- just a not working / disabled
> optimisation, but changes in stats could sublty break it. E.g. grouping
> @batch and @mean into a union will increase estimated average by several
> orders of magnitude.
> 
> Jens, what do you think?
> 
> 
> 
> On 14/06/2019 16:40, Josef Bacik wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 02:44:11PM +0300, Pavel Begunkov (Silence) wrote:
>>> From: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> There are implicit assumptions about struct blk_rq_stats, which make
>>> it's very easy to misuse. The first patch fixes consequences, and the
>>> second employs type-system to prevent recurrences.
>>>
>>>
>>> Pavel Begunkov (2):
>>>   blk-iolatency: Fix zero mean in previous stats
>>>   blk-stats: Introduce explicit stat staging buffers
>>>
>>
>> I don't have a problem with this, but it's up to Jens I suppose
>>
>> Acked-by: Josef Bacik <josef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Josef
>>
> 

-- 
Yours sincerely,
Pavel Begunkov

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux