Re: [PATCH 2/9] block: optionally mark pages dirty in bio_release_pages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 19-06-26 15:49:21, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> A lot of callers of bio_release_pages also want to mark the released
> pages as dirty.  Add a mark_dirty parameter to avoid a second
> relatively expensive bio_for_each_segment_all loop.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
> ---
>  block/bio.c         | 12 +++++++-----
>  include/linux/bio.h |  2 +-
>  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/block/bio.c b/block/bio.c
> index 9bc7d28ae997..7f3920b6baca 100644
> --- a/block/bio.c
> +++ b/block/bio.c
> @@ -845,7 +845,7 @@ static void bio_get_pages(struct bio *bio)
>  		get_page(bvec->bv_page);
>  }
>  
> -void bio_release_pages(struct bio *bio)
> +void bio_release_pages(struct bio *bio, bool mark_dirty)
>  {
>  	struct bvec_iter_all iter_all;
>  	struct bio_vec *bvec;
> @@ -853,8 +853,11 @@ void bio_release_pages(struct bio *bio)
>  	if (bio_flagged(bio, BIO_NO_PAGE_REF))
>  		return;
>  
> -	bio_for_each_segment_all(bvec, bio, iter_all)
> +	bio_for_each_segment_all(bvec, bio, iter_all) {
> +		if (mark_dirty && !PageCompound(bvec->bv_page))
> +			set_page_dirty_lock(bvec->bv_page);

Christoph,

Could you please explain a bit why we should not make it dirty in case
of compound page?



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux