Re: [PATCH V4 0/5] block: improve print_req_error

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06/20/2019 12:35 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 6/19/19 11:12 AM, Chaitanya Kulkarni wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This patch-series is based on the initial patch posted by
>> Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>. While debugging the driver and block
>> layer this print message is very meaningful. Also, we centralize the
>> REQ_OP_XXX to the string conversion in the blk-core.c so that other
>> dependent subsystems can use this helper without having to duplicate
>> the code e.g. f2fs, blk-mq-debugfs.c.
>>
>> Please consider this for 5.3.
>
> Something is wonky here. For 5.2, I just merged:
>
> commit f9bc64a0f0f884036d76d71edeaafb994c5ceddf (origin/for-5.3/block)
> Author: Chaitanya Kulkarni <chaitanya.kulkarni@xxxxxxx>
> Date:   Thu Jun 13 07:14:21 2019 -0700
>
>      block: use req_op() to maintain consistency
>
> and then you go and do something different for 5.3?

I miss something. I just sent a V5 with latest for-next:-

https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-block/msg41848.html

Please let me know if issue still exists.
>





[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux