Rest of the patches in this series are reviewed by Bart and Chao. Can someone please take a look at this patch and provide some feedback ? On 6/19/19 10:14 AM, Chaitanya Kulkarni wrote: > Improve the print_req_error with additional request fields which are > helpful for debugging. Use newly introduced blk_op_str() to print the > REQ_OP_XXX in the string format. > > Signed-off-by: Chaitanya Kulkarni <chaitanya.kulkarni@xxxxxxx> > --- > block/blk-core.c | 11 +++++++---- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c > index c92b5a16a27a..88a716c3dc56 100644 > --- a/block/blk-core.c > +++ b/block/blk-core.c > @@ -212,11 +212,14 @@ static void print_req_error(struct request *req, blk_status_t status, > return; > > printk_ratelimited(KERN_ERR > - "%s: %s error, dev %s, sector %llu op 0x%x flags 0x%x\n", > + "%s: %s error, dev %s, sector %llu op 0x%x:(%s) flags 0x%x " > + "phys_seg %u prio class %u\n", > caller, blk_errors[idx].name, > - req->rq_disk ? req->rq_disk->disk_name : "?", > - blk_rq_pos(req), req_op(req), > - req->cmd_flags & ~REQ_OP_MASK); > + req->rq_disk ? req->rq_disk->disk_name : "?", > + blk_rq_pos(req), req_op(req), blk_op_str(req_op(req)), > + req->cmd_flags & ~REQ_OP_MASK, > + req->nr_phys_segments, > + IOPRIO_PRIO_CLASS(req->ioprio)); > } > > static void req_bio_endio(struct request *rq, struct bio *bio, >
