Re: [PATCH 1/2] block: improve print_req_error

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 6/11/19 10:02 PM, Chaitanya Kulkarni wrote:
> From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
> 
> Print the calling function instead of print_req_error as a prefix, and
> print the operation and op_flags separately instead of the whole field.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chaitanya Kulkarni <chaitanya.kulkarni@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>  block/blk-core.c | 16 +++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
> index ee1b35fe8572..d1a227cfb72e 100644
> --- a/block/blk-core.c
> +++ b/block/blk-core.c
> @@ -167,18 +167,20 @@ int blk_status_to_errno(blk_status_t status)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blk_status_to_errno);
>  
> -static void print_req_error(struct request *req, blk_status_t status)
> +static void print_req_error(struct request *req, blk_status_t status,
> +		const char *caller)
>  {
>  	int idx = (__force int)status;
>  
>  	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(idx >= ARRAY_SIZE(blk_errors)))
>  		return;
>  
> -	printk_ratelimited(KERN_ERR "%s: %s error, dev %s, sector %llu flags %x\n",
> -				__func__, blk_errors[idx].name,
> -				req->rq_disk ?  req->rq_disk->disk_name : "?",
> -				(unsigned long long)blk_rq_pos(req),
> -				req->cmd_flags);
> +	printk_ratelimited(KERN_ERR
> +		"%s: %s error, dev %s, sector %llu op 0x%x flags 0x%x\n",
> +		caller, blk_errors[idx].name,
> +		req->rq_disk ?  req->rq_disk->disk_name : "?",
> +		blk_rq_pos(req), req_op(req),
> +		req->cmd_flags & ~REQ_OP_MASK);
>  }
>  
>  static void req_bio_endio(struct request *rq, struct bio *bio,
> @@ -1360,7 +1362,7 @@ bool blk_update_request(struct request *req, blk_status_t error,
>  
>  	if (unlikely(error && !blk_rq_is_passthrough(req) &&
>  		     !(req->rq_flags & RQF_QUIET)))
> -		print_req_error(req, error);
> +		print_req_error(req, error, __func__);
>  
>  	blk_account_io_completion(req, nr_bytes);
>  
> 
I did ask this already, but didn't get an answer:
Why do we have the __func__ argument?
Can it print anything else than 'blk_update_request' ?
If so, can't it be dropped?

Cheers,

Hannes
-- 
Dr. Hannes Reinecke		   Teamlead Storage & Networking
hare@xxxxxxx			               +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Mary Higgins, Sri Rasiah
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux