On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 10:08:47AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > That is besides the point. Your code changes an internal API to be more > stringent and less forgiving. This causes failures, presumably because > callers of that API took advantage (on purpose or not) of it. > When changing an API, you are responsible for both ends. You can not claim > that the callers of that API are buggy. Taking advangage of a forgiving > API is not a bug. If you change an API, and that change causes a failure, > that is a regression, not a bug on the side of the caller. As said I offered to fix these, even if this isn't my fault. I'm also still waiting for the the other reports.
