On 3/29/19 10:52 PM, Jens Axboe wrote: > On 3/29/19 8:51 AM, Martin K. Petersen wrote: >> >> Jens, >> >>> The integrity stuff still has that nasty pointer in there. It'd be >>> nice to get rid of that as well, and hide it all in a parent container >>> of the bio. >> >> That's fine with me. We really didn't have that option a decade ago. > > Right, but now we do. Hence trying to nudge things in that direction, > instead of adding another pointer to struct bio for a new use case. I'd > much rather go that route, instead of unionizing with another pointer > that should be going away instead. > No problem, will update in next version. Let me wait a while for feedback about the verify callback. Thank you!
