Re: [block] 4e366a7962: blktests.nvme.005.fail

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 28/03/2019 18:52, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 3/28/19 11:48 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 05:31:29PM +0100, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
>>> In all cases I could reproduce it I had nsegs == 2 and
>>> rq->nr_phys_segments == 1 (rq->bio->bi_phys_segments == 1).
>>
>> And all cases are pass through as well?
>>
>> Can you check if this still shows up with the series from Ming which
>> switches the passthrough requests to use multi-page biovecs aswell
>> and gets rid of the hairy code you quote below.

Good idea, thanks.

> Since I already merged that in my 5.2 but didn't push it out yet, I've
> made a temporary branch available if you want to test through that:
> 
> git://git.kernel.dk/linux-block 5.2-tmp

Awesome thanks.


-- 
Johannes Thumshirn                            SUSE Labs Filesystems
jthumshirn@xxxxxxx                                +49 911 74053 689
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Mary Higgins, Sri Rasiah
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
Key fingerprint = EC38 9CAB C2C4 F25D 8600 D0D0 0393 969D 2D76 0850



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux