[RFC 2/2] mm, sl[aou]b: test whether kmalloc() alignment works as expected

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Quick and dirty init test that kmalloc() alignment works as expected for
power-of-two sizes after the previous patch.

Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx>
---
 mm/slab_common.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)

diff --git a/mm/slab_common.c b/mm/slab_common.c
index e591d5688558..de10ca9640e0 100644
--- a/mm/slab_common.c
+++ b/mm/slab_common.c
@@ -1621,3 +1621,22 @@ int should_failslab(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t gfpflags)
 	return 0;
 }
 ALLOW_ERROR_INJECTION(should_failslab, ERRNO);
+
+static int __init slab_kmalloc_test(void)
+{
+	int i;
+
+	for (i = KMALLOC_SHIFT_LOW; i <= KMALLOC_SHIFT_HIGH; i++) {
+		unsigned int size = 1 << i;
+		void * obj = kmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
+		unsigned long objaddr = (unsigned long) obj;
+
+		printk("Size %u obj %px alignment: %s", size, obj,
+			(((objaddr & (size - 1)) == 0) ? "OK" : "WRONG"));
+		kfree(obj);
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+__initcall(slab_kmalloc_test);
-- 
2.21.0




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux