On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 09:04:37PM -0700, James Smart wrote: > > > On 3/18/2019 6:31 PM, Ming Lei wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 10:37:08AM -0700, James Smart wrote: > > > > > > On 3/17/2019 8:29 PM, Ming Lei wrote: > > > > In NVMe's error handler, follows the typical steps for tearing down > > > > hardware: > > > > > > > > 1) stop blk_mq hw queues > > > > 2) stop the real hw queues > > > > 3) cancel in-flight requests via > > > > blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter(tags, cancel_request, ...) > > > > cancel_request(): > > > > mark the request as abort > > > > blk_mq_complete_request(req); > > > > 4) destroy real hw queues > > > > > > > > However, there may be race between #3 and #4, because blk_mq_complete_request() > > > > actually completes the request asynchronously. > > > > > > > > This patch introduces blk_mq_complete_request_sync() for fixing the > > > > above race. > > > > > > > This won't help FC at all. Inherently, the "completion" has to be > > > asynchronous as line traffic may be required. > > > > > > e.g. FC doesn't use nvme_complete_request() in the iterator routine. > > > > > Looks FC has done the sync already, see nvme_fc_delete_association(): > > > > ... > > /* wait for all io that had to be aborted */ > > spin_lock_irq(&ctrl->lock); > > wait_event_lock_irq(ctrl->ioabort_wait, ctrl->iocnt == 0, ctrl->lock); > > ctrl->flags &= ~FCCTRL_TERMIO; > > spin_unlock_irq(&ctrl->lock); > > yes - but the iterator started a lot of the back end io terminating in > parallel. So waiting on many happening in parallel is better than waiting 1 > at a time. OK, that is FC's sync, not related with this patch. > Even so, I've always disliked this wait and would have > preferred to exit the thread with something monitoring the completions > re-queuing a work thread to finish. Then I guess you may like this patch given it actually avoids the potential wait, :-) What the patch does is to convert the remote completion(#1) into local completion(#2): 1) previously one request may be completed remotely by blk_mq_complete_request(): rq->csd.func = __blk_mq_complete_request_remote; rq->csd.info = rq; rq->csd.flags = 0; smp_call_function_single_async(ctx->cpu, &rq->csd); 2) this patch changes the remote completion into local completion via blk_mq_complete_request_sync(), so all in-flight requests can be aborted before destroying queue. q->mq_ops->complete(rq); As I mentioned in another email, there isn't any waiting for aborting request, nvme_cancel_request() simply requeues the request to blk-mq under this situation. Thanks, Ming