On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 2:18 PM Igor Konopko <igor.j.konopko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On 18.03.2019 11:28, Hans Holmberg wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 5:11 PM Igor Konopko <igor.j.konopko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> This patch adds the possibility to provide full device path (like > >> /dev/nvme0n1) when specifying device on top of which pblk instance > >> should be created/removed. > >> > >> This makes creation of targets from nvme-cli (or other ioctl based > >> tools) more unified with other commands in comparison with current > >> situation where almost all commands uses full device path with except > >> of lightnvm creation/removal parameter which uses just 'nvme0n1' > >> naming convention. After this changes both approach will be valid. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Igor Konopko <igor.j.konopko@xxxxxxxxx> > >> --- > >> drivers/lightnvm/core.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++----- > >> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/lightnvm/core.c b/drivers/lightnvm/core.c > >> index c01f83b..838c3d8 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/lightnvm/core.c > >> +++ b/drivers/lightnvm/core.c > >> @@ -1195,6 +1195,21 @@ void nvm_unregister(struct nvm_dev *dev) > >> } > >> EXPORT_SYMBOL(nvm_unregister); > >> > >> +#define PREFIX_STR "/dev/" > >> +static void nvm_normalize_path(char *path) > >> +{ > >> + path[DISK_NAME_LEN - 1] = '\0'; > >> + if (!memcmp(PREFIX_STR, path, > >> + sizeof(char) * strlen(PREFIX_STR))) { > >> + /* > >> + * User provide name in '/dev/nvme0n1' format, > >> + * so we need to skip '/dev/' for comparison > >> + */ > >> + memmove(path, path + sizeof(char) * strlen(PREFIX_STR), > >> + (DISK_NAME_LEN - strlen(PREFIX_STR)) * sizeof(char)); > >> + } > >> +} > >> + > > > > I don't like this. Why add string parsing to the kernel? Can't this > > feature be added to the nvme tool? > > Since during target creation/removal in kernel, we already operate on > strings multiple times (strcmp calls for target types, nvme device, > target names) my idea was to keep this in the same layer too. Oh, pardon the terse and rather grumpy review. Let me elaborate: String parsing is best avoided when possible, and i don't think it's worth increasing the kernel code size and changing the behavior of the IOCTL when its fully doable to do this in userspace. Thanks, Hans > > > > >> static int __nvm_configure_create(struct nvm_ioctl_create *create) > >> { > >> struct nvm_dev *dev; > >> @@ -1304,9 +1319,9 @@ static long nvm_ioctl_dev_create(struct file *file, void __user *arg) > >> return -EINVAL; > >> } > >> > >> - create.dev[DISK_NAME_LEN - 1] = '\0'; > >> + nvm_normalize_path(create.dev); > >> + nvm_normalize_path(create.tgtname); > >> create.tgttype[NVM_TTYPE_NAME_MAX - 1] = '\0'; > >> - create.tgtname[DISK_NAME_LEN - 1] = '\0'; > >> > >> if (create.flags != 0) { > >> __u32 flags = create.flags; > >> @@ -1333,7 +1348,7 @@ static long nvm_ioctl_dev_remove(struct file *file, void __user *arg) > >> if (copy_from_user(&remove, arg, sizeof(struct nvm_ioctl_remove))) > >> return -EFAULT; > >> > >> - remove.tgtname[DISK_NAME_LEN - 1] = '\0'; > >> + nvm_normalize_path(remove.tgtname); > >> > >> if (remove.flags != 0) { > >> pr_err("nvm: no flags supported\n"); > >> @@ -1373,8 +1388,6 @@ static long nvm_ioctl_dev_factory(struct file *file, void __user *arg) > >> if (copy_from_user(&fact, arg, sizeof(struct nvm_ioctl_dev_factory))) > >> return -EFAULT; > >> > >> - fact.dev[DISK_NAME_LEN - 1] = '\0'; > >> - > >> if (fact.flags & ~(NVM_FACTORY_NR_BITS - 1)) > >> return -EINVAL; > >> > >> -- > >> 2.9.5 > >>