Re: [PATCH 7/8] nvme: use blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 3/15/19 5:39 PM, James Smart wrote:


On 3/15/2019 9:33 AM, James Smart wrote:
On 3/15/2019 1:57 AM, Jianchao Wang wrote:
blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter is not safe that it could get stale request
in tags->rqs[]. Use blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter here. A new helper
interface nvme_iterate_inflight_rqs is introduced to iterate
all of the ns under a ctrl.

Signed-off-by: Jianchao Wang <jianchao.w.wang@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/nvme/host/core.c   | 12 ++++++++++++
  drivers/nvme/host/fc.c     | 12 ++++++------
  drivers/nvme/host/nvme.h   |  2 ++
  drivers/nvme/host/pci.c    |  5 +++--
  drivers/nvme/host/rdma.c   |  6 +++---
  drivers/nvme/host/tcp.c    |  5 +++--
  drivers/nvme/target/loop.c |  6 +++---
  7 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
index 6a9dd68..5760fad 100644
--- a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
+++ b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
@@ -3816,6 +3816,18 @@ void nvme_start_queues(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl)
  }
  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nvme_start_queues);
  +void nvme_iterate_inflight_rqs(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl,
+        busy_iter_fn *fn, void *data)
+{
+    struct nvme_ns *ns;
+
+    down_read(&ctrl->namespaces_rwsem);
+    list_for_each_entry(ns, &ctrl->namespaces, list)
+        blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter(ns->queue, fn, data, true);
+    up_read(&ctrl->namespaces_rwsem);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nvme_iterate_inflight_rqs);

Hmm... so this aborts ios for namespaces. How about ios that aren't for a namespace but rather for the controller itself.  For example, anything on the admin queue ?   Rather critical for those ios be terminated as well.
NVM - didn't look at which tag set.  but it does highlight - doesn't cover anything issued by core/transport on the io queues.

Actually, I would consider that an error.
_All_ commands on io queues (internal or block-layer generated) whould be tracked sbitmap and hence the tag iterator. That's what we have the 'private' tags for, and why the iter callback has this ominous 'bool' argument...

Cheers,

Hannes



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux