Re: [PATCH 13/13] lightnvm: Inherit mdts from the parent nvme device

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




> On 4 Mar 2019, at 14.04, Igor Konopko <igor.j.konopko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>> On 04.03.2019 13:22, Hans Holmberg wrote:
>>> On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 12:44 PM Javier González <javier@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On 4 Mar 2019, at 12.30, Hans Holmberg <hans@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 10:05 AM Javier González <javier@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>> On 27 Feb 2019, at 18.14, Igor Konopko <igor.j.konopko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Current lightnvm and pblk implementation does not care
>>>>>> about NVMe max data transfer size, which can be smaller
>>>>>> than 64*K=256K. This patch fixes issues related to that.
>>>> 
>>>> Could you describe *what* issues you are fixing?
> 
> I'm fixing the issue related to controllers which NVMe max data transfer size is lower that 256K (for example 128K, which happens for existing NVMe controllers and NVMe spec compliant). Such a controllers are not able to handle command which contains 64 PPAs, since the the size of DMAed buffer will be above the capabilities of such a controller.
> 

OK. Then let’s try to get support for this ASAP. If the rest agree on a feature bit then it should be straightforward. If not, let’s at least add a warning if MDTS < 64 so that people are able to identify where the missing performance went when updating the kernel if they are not using MDTS on their OCSSD implementations. 

Javier




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux